Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 24;12:20254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24541-7

Table 1.

Mean performance (in %) for the different models on all holdout data sets of cross validation.

Classifier Skull stripping Registration Balanced accuracy Sensitivity Specificity AUC
CNN No 71.26 ± 2.86% 55.55 ± 7.51% 86.96 ± 3.95% 0.75 ± 0.02
Lin. 74.27 ± 3.83% 63.13 ± 9.05% 85.40 ± 6.45% 0.80 ± 0.05
Nonlin. 77.61 ± 4.44% 64.79 ± 5.02% 90.43 ± 5.19% 0.85 ± 0.06
CNN Yes 77.66 ± 4.39% 69.70 ± 7.65% 85.63 ± 4.06% 0.83 ± 0.05
Lin. 79.45 ± 3.34% 76.87 ± 4.81% 82.03 ± 6.23% 0.86 ± 0.05
Nonlin. 82.13 ± 5.08% 73.47 ± 7.89% 90.78 ± 4.92% 0.88 ± 0.05
CNN+Graz+ No 80.66 ± 4.80% 74.95 ± 7.85% 86.36 ± 2.85% 0.88 ± 0.04
Lin. 86.19 ± 6.01% 79.73 ± 10.72% 92.66 ± 3.73% 0.92 ± 0.04
Nonlin. 83.50 ± 5.90% 77.16 ± 8.95% 89.83 ± 4.49% 0.90 ± 0.04
Logistic regression* Yes Lin.** 82.00 ± 4.25% 80.57 ± 7.16% 83.43 ± 2.45% 0.90 ± 0.04

Highest values per column are highlighted in bold.

AUC area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics.

*Logistic regression by FSL-SIENAX.

**Linear registration is applied during FSL-SIENAX processing to obtain scaling factor.