Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;86:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104334

Table 4.

Prognostic implication of different LV function parameters.

Variable Hazard ratio
(95% CI)
Significance p
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetry
LV EDV 1.01 (0.97–1.05) 0.775
LV ESV 1.01 (0.94–1.09) 0.779
LV SV 1.01 (0.95–1.07) 0.827
LV EF 0.97 (0.89–1.06) 0.539
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance deformation imaging
FT LV GLS 1.10 (0.93–1.31) 0.259
FT LV GCS 0.97 (0.92–1.04) 0.409
FT LV GRS 1.02 (0.98–1.06) 0.391
LV LAS rest 0.83 (0.67–1.02) 0.081
LV LAS exercise-stress 0.92 (0.80–1.06) 0.258
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance hemodynamic force
LV longitudinal force (RMS) 0.89 (0.79–1.01) 0.063
Systolic peak 0.95 (0.91–0.99) 0.016
Systolic impulse 0.90 (0.82–0.98) 0.016
LV systolic/diastolic transition 1.01 (0.91–1.12) 0.917
Diastolic deceleration 1.00 (0.89–1.13) 0.977
Atrial thrust 1.02 (0.93–1.12) 0.682

LV, left ventricular; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; SV, stroke volume; EF, ejection fraction; FT, feature-tracking; GLS/GCS/GRS, global longitudinal/circumferential/radial strain; LAS, long axis strain; RMS, root mean square; HDF, hemodynamic force. Volumes are given in ml/m2 body surface area, strain and HDF values in %. Hazard rations for the occurrence of cardiovascular events were calculated using Cox regression analyses. Bold p-values indicate statistical significance.