Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 15;15(22):8092. doi: 10.3390/ma15228092

Table 6.

Optimum results given by TLBO, JAYA, and GA.

Sr. no. Response Optimization Method Orientation (°) Laser Power (KW) Scanning Speed (mm/s) Fitness Value
1 Hardness TLBO 90 136 650 −71.6013 Hv
JAYA 90 136 650 −71.61 Hv
GA 90 136 650 −71.60 Hv
2 Surface roughness TLBO 90 115 650 8.122 µm
JAYA 90 115 650 8.122 µm
GA 90 115 650 8.12 µm
3 MPCI TLBO 90 136 650 0.747244
JAYA 90 136 650 0.897
GA 90 135.9 649 0.878