Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 20;9(11):404. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9110404

Table 4.

Outcome.

Biatrial Bicaval Modified Bicaval p-Value
Outcome Variables (n = 37) (n = 191) (n = 10)
Postoperative morbidity
 Neurological events, % 8 (27.6) 32/189 (16.9) 1/9 (11.1) 0.72
 Thoracic re-exploration, % 15 (40.5) 53/189 (28.0) 2/9 (22.2) 0.30
 Acute graft rejection, % 1 (2.7) 14/189 (7.4) 1/9 (11.1) 0.37
 Infections, % 10 (27.0) 43/189 (22.8) 2/9 (22.2) 0.90
Heart rhythm
 At hospital discharge
  Sinus rhythm, % 27/33 (81.8) 157/163 (96.3) 10 (100.0) 0.01
  Pacemaker, % 6/33 (18.2) 5/164 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 0.01 ††
 At last follow-up
  Sinus rhythm, % 27/33 (81.8) 150/162 (92.6) 10 (100.0) 0.14
  Pacemaker, % 6/33 (18.2) 6/162 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 0.01 †††
Survival
 30-day, n (%) 35 (94.6) 169/189 (89.4) 9/9 (100.0) 0.56
 1-year, n (%) 21/26 (80.8) 137/174 (78.7) 1/1 (100.0) >0.99

Postoperative outcome and early survival. Comparison of biatrial (n = 37), bicaval (n = 191) and modified bicaval (n = 10) anastomoses technique. Results are presented as mean values with the standard deviation respectively percentages of the whole. Post-hoc analysis of sinus rhythm at discharge: biatrial vs. bicaval: p = 0.01, biatrial vs. modified bicaval: p = 0.31, bicaval vs. modified bicaval: p > 0.99. †† Post-hoc analysis of implanted pacemakers at discharge: biatrial vs. bicaval: p = 0.004, biatrial vs. modified bicaval: p = 0.31, bicaval vs. modified bicaval: p > 0.99. ††† Post-hoc analysis of implanted pacemakers at last follow-up visit: biatrial vs. bicaval: p = 0.01, biatrial vs. modified bicaval: p = 0.31, bicaval vs. modified bicaval: p > 0.99.