Table 4.
Biatrial | Bicaval | Modified Bicaval | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome Variables | (n = 37) | (n = 191) | (n = 10) | |
Postoperative morbidity | ||||
Neurological events, % | 8 (27.6) | 32/189 (16.9) | 1/9 (11.1) | 0.72 |
Thoracic re-exploration, % | 15 (40.5) | 53/189 (28.0) | 2/9 (22.2) | 0.30 |
Acute graft rejection, % | 1 (2.7) | 14/189 (7.4) | 1/9 (11.1) | 0.37 |
Infections, % | 10 (27.0) | 43/189 (22.8) | 2/9 (22.2) | 0.90 |
Heart rhythm | ||||
At hospital discharge | ||||
Sinus rhythm, % | 27/33 (81.8) | 157/163 (96.3) | 10 (100.0) | 0.01 † |
Pacemaker, % | 6/33 (18.2) | 5/164 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.01 †† |
At last follow-up | ||||
Sinus rhythm, % | 27/33 (81.8) | 150/162 (92.6) | 10 (100.0) | 0.14 |
Pacemaker, % | 6/33 (18.2) | 6/162 (3.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0.01 ††† |
Survival | ||||
30-day, n (%) | 35 (94.6) | 169/189 (89.4) | 9/9 (100.0) | 0.56 |
1-year, n (%) | 21/26 (80.8) | 137/174 (78.7) | 1/1 (100.0) | >0.99 |
Postoperative outcome and early survival. Comparison of biatrial (n = 37), bicaval (n = 191) and modified bicaval (n = 10) anastomoses technique. Results are presented as mean values with the standard deviation respectively percentages of the whole. † Post-hoc analysis of sinus rhythm at discharge: biatrial vs. bicaval: p = 0.01, biatrial vs. modified bicaval: p = 0.31, bicaval vs. modified bicaval: p > 0.99. †† Post-hoc analysis of implanted pacemakers at discharge: biatrial vs. bicaval: p = 0.004, biatrial vs. modified bicaval: p = 0.31, bicaval vs. modified bicaval: p > 0.99. ††† Post-hoc analysis of implanted pacemakers at last follow-up visit: biatrial vs. bicaval: p = 0.01, biatrial vs. modified bicaval: p = 0.31, bicaval vs. modified bicaval: p > 0.99.