Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;14(11):2416. doi: 10.3390/v14112416

Table 2.

Summary of linear mixed effects models fit to examine the relationship between anti-S IgG log10 AU/mL (light grey) or anti-N IgG log10 AU/mL (dark grey) and COVID-19 vaccination status adjusting for: biological sex, age, and time from qPCR diagnosis.

Unconditional Mean Model (S) Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
Participant ID (n = 42) 0.434
Residual 0.566
Random Intercept Model Variable Fixed Effect Estimate 95%CI
Anti-Spike IgG Intercept 4.84 3.27–6.39
Vaccine-Yes 0.40 −0.41–1.20
Biological Sex-Male 0.93 0.068–1.79
Age (Years) −0.029 −0.063–0.0057
Time from +ve qPCR Test * −0.20 −0.47–0.054
Vaccine: Time * 1.86 1.39–2.21
Random Effects Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
0.893
Unconditional Mean Model (N)
Participant ID (n = 42) 0.875
Residual 0.125
Random Intercept Model Variable Fixed Effect Estimate 95%CI
Anti-Nucleocapsid IgG Intercept 3.14 2.48–3.79
Vaccine-Yes −0.080 −0.42–0.26
Biological Sex-Male 0.27 −0.095–0.63
Age (Years) 0.016 0.0017–0.03
Time from +ve qPCR Test * −0.40 −0.53–(−0.27)
Vaccine: Time * −0.077 -0.25–0.11
Random Effects Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
0.30

* An effect modification term was incorporated to explore how the effect of vaccination on antibody concentration differs by time since diagnosis with a qPCR test. Unconditional means models were fit to partition the variance by participant without inclusion of other exposure variables. Fixed effect models were built by applying the common cause criterion to select covariates which are a cause of the exposure, outcome, or both.