Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 7;8(11):303. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8110303

Table 1.

Radiomics harmonization in recent multicenter MRI studies.

Reference MRI Sequences/
Cancer Type
Variation Across Harmonization Techniques Clinical Question
A. Carre et al. (2020) [16] T1w, T2w-fl1air
(brain-glioma)
3 centers Intensity-based Tumor grade classification
M. Bologna et al. (2019) [20] T1w, T2w
(brain)
27 centers Intensity-based Feature stability
H. Moradmand et al. (2019) [21] FLAIR, T1, T1C, and T2
(brain-glioblastoma)
8 centers Intensity-based Edema, necrosis, enhancement, and tumor
Y. Li et al. (2021) [22] T1
(brain)
2 scanners Both Scanner effect removal
L. J Isaksson et al. (2020) [23] T2w
(prostate cancer)
1 scanner Intensity-based Cancer identification
A. Crombe et al. (2020) [24] T2w
(sarcoma)
3 centers Intensity-based Prediction of metastatic-relapse-free survival
Chatterjee et al. (2019) [25] T2-weighted fast spin echo (denoted as T2);
T1-weighted fast gradient echo with DCE-MRI and a postcontrast image (post-Gado);
and diffusion-weighted MRI
(primary uterine adenocarcinoma)
2 centers Intensity-based Lymphovascular space invasion and cancer staging
K.A. Wahid et al. (2021) [26] T2w
(head and neck)
15 HET cohorts-15 HOM- cohorts Intensity-based Radiotherapy treatment
J. C. Reinhold et al. (2018) [27] T1-w, T2-w, and FLAIR
(brain)
1 dataset with 18 patients Intensity-based Medical image synthesis
J. P. Fortin et al. (2018) [28] MRI
(brain)
11 scanners Feature-based Cortical thickness harmonization
J. C. Beer et al. (2019) [29] Structural MRI
(brain)
58 sites Feature-based Alzheimer prediction
C. Ma et al. (2019) [30] 3D Cardiac MRI 20 scans (10 training and 10 test) Intensity-based Image segmentation
D. Tian et al. (2022) [31] T1 MRI
(brain)
12 centers Intensity-based Gray matter analysis
M. Shah et al. (2011) [32] T1w, T2w, and PDw
(brain)
10 scanners Intensity-based Multiple sclerosis lesion identification
Liu et al. (2018) [33] T2w
(brain-glioma)
2 cohorts Intensity-based Prediction of progression-free survival in lower-grade gliomas
F. Lucia et al. (2019 [34]) T1, T2 DWI
(cervical cancer)
3 centers Feature-based Cervical cancer prognosis
Peeken et al. (2019) [35] Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat saturated (T1FSGd),
fat-saturated T2-weighted (T2FS)
(sarcoma)
2 cohorts Intensity/ feature-based Classification of low and high grade soft tissue sarcoma
Liu et al. (2019) [36] T1w,T2w-fl1air
(brain)
4 centers Feature-based Prediction of the individualized treatment response in children with cerebral palsy
C. Hognon et al. (2019) [37] T1, T1c, T2, FLAIR
(glioblastoma)
3 centers Intensity-based Image segmentation
R. Da-Ano et al. (2020) [38] Post-injection gadolinium contrast-enhanced MRI (GADO),
T2-weighted MRI (T2) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) maps
from diffusion-weighted MRI
(cervical cancer)
3 centers Feature-based Prediction and treatment adaptation
D. Moyer et al. (2020) [39] Diffusion MRI
(brain)
15 patients from 2 scanners Intensity-based White Matter analysis
G. Modanwal et al. (2020) [40] DCE-MRI
(breast cancer)
124 patients from 2 scanners Intensity-based Evaluation
J. Zhong et al. (2020) [41] Neonatal DTI-MRI
(brain)
84 neonates data from 2 sites Deep Learning Harmonize neonatal data
K. Armanious et al. (2020) [42] T1
(brain)
11 patients Intensity-based Motion correction
Scalco et al. (2020) [43] T1w, T2w
(prostate)
3 different organs of interest Intensity-based Reproducibility estimation
R. Da-Ano et al. (2021) [44] Post-injection gadolinium contrast-enhanced MRI (GADO), T2-weighted MRI (T2) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) maps from diffusion-weighted MRI (cervical cancer) 3 centers Feature-based Prediction
Saint Martin et al. (2021) [45] T1, T2, T1-DCE
(breast)
2 phantoms
(2 scanners and 3 dual breast coils)
Both Lesion classification
N.K. Dinsdale et al. (2021) [46] T1w
(neuroimages)
3 dataset centers Feature-based Age prediction and segmentation
F. Orlhac et al. (2021) [47] T1, FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1w) images and T2w
(brain/prostate)
2 centers Feature-based Impact of harmonization to distinguish between Gleason grades