Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2022 Oct 31;8(11):1154. doi: 10.3390/jof8111154

Three New Trichoderma Species in Harzianum Clade Associated with the Contaminated Substrates of Edible Fungi

Zi-Jian Cao 1,2, Wen-Tao Qin 2,*, Juan Zhao 2, Yu Liu 2, Shou-Xian Wang 2, Su-Yue Zheng 1,*
Editors: Lei Cai, Cheng Gao
PMCID: PMC9696741  PMID: 36354921

Abstract

Trichoderma is known worldwide as biocontrol agents of plant diseases, producers of enzymes and antibiotics, and competitive contaminants of edible fungi. In this investigation of contaminated substrates of edible fungi from North China, 39 strains belonging to 10 Trichoderma species isolated from four kinds of edible fungi were obtained, and three novel species belonging to the Harzianum clade were isolated from the contaminated substrates of Auricularia heimuer and Pholiota adipose. They were recognized based on integrated studies of phenotypic features, culture characteristics, and molecular analyses of RNA polymerase II subunit B and translation elongation factor 1-α genes. Trichoderma auriculariae was strongly supported as a separate lineage and differed from T. vermifimicola due to its larger conidia. Trichoderma miyunense was closely related to T. ganodermatigerum but differed due to its smaller conidia and higher optimum mycelial growth temperature. As a separate lineage, T. pholiotae was distinct from T. guizhouense and T. pseudoasiaticum due to its higher optimum mycelial growth temperature and larger conidia. This study extends the understanding of Trichoderma spp. contaminating substrates of edible fungi and updates knowledge of species diversity in the group.

Keywords: Hypocreaceae, Trichoderma, phylogeny, morphology, taxonomy

1. Introduction

Trichoderma Pers. is ubiquitous in various niches and around the world. The genus contains at least eight infrageneric clades, of which the Harzianum clade is one of the largest [1]. According to our investigated statistics, the Harzianum clade consists of more than 95 accepted species, which are morphologically heterogeneous and phylogenetically complicated. They play important roles in agriculture, industry, and other fields and are employed as biocides or biofertilizers for plant growth [2,3,4], act as producers of enzymes and antibiotics, and are endophytic in plants that can resist both physiological stress and pathogen invasion [5,6].

Green mold contamination caused by Trichoderma spp. in the cultivation and various growth stages of edible fungi has been one of the biggest biological constraints in the industry since the 1980s [7], with the economic losses accounting for 10–20% of total production [8]. At present, green mold is one of the most devastating diseases in nearly all production areas of cultivated edible fungi due to its high disease incidence and serious economic loss [9,10]. Mycelia of Trichoderma spp. show stronger competitiveness than those of edible fungi, and thus they can inhibit mycelial growth or decrease the fruiting rate of edible fungi. Lots of green conidia of Trichoderma will gradually cover the contaminated substrates or fruiting bodies, and the contaminated fruiting bodies will eventually shrivel and rot.

In order to better understand the Trichoderma species contaminating substrates of edible fungi and preserve biological control resources, substrates of edible fungi contaminated by green mold in North China were investigated, and three undescribed species belonging to the Harzianum clade were found on contaminated substrates of Auricularia heimuer and Pholiota adipose. Their phylogenetic positions were determined based on sequence analyses of the combined translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α) and the second largest nuclear RNA polymerase subunit (rpb2) genes. Similarities and differences in morphological characteristics between the new species and their closely related species were investigated and compared in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolates and Specimens

Specimens were separately collected from contaminated substrate of edible fungi in North China from 2020 to 2022 (Table S1), and strains were isolated following the method of a previous study [11]. The ex-type strains were deposited in the culture collection of Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (JZB culture collection).

2.2. Morphology and Growth Characterization

For morphological studies, growth rates were determined on three different media: potato dextrose agar (PDA; 200 g potato, 18 g dextrose, 18 g agar, and 1 L distilled water), cornmeal dextrose agar (CMD; 40 g cornmeal, 20 g glucose, 18 g agar, and 1 L distilled water), and synthetic low nutrient agar (SNA; 1 g KH2PO4, 1 g KNO3, 0.5 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g KCl, 0.2 g glucose, 0.2 g sucrose, 18 g agar, and 1 L distilled water) at 25, 30, and 35 °C in darkness. Mycelial discs (5 mm diameter) were incubated in Petri dishes (90 mm diameter) with three replicates for each isolate. Colony diameters were measured after 3 days. The time when mycelia entirely covered the surface of the plate and the morphological characteristics of colonies, such as colony appearance, color, and spore production, were recorded [12]. For microscopic morphology, photographs were taken with an Axio Imager Z2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Microscopic characteristics and micromorphological data were examined on the cultures grown on SNA and PDA for 7–9 days at 25 °C.

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the cultures grown on PDA for 7 days using a plant genomic DNA Kit (DP305, TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China). Fragments of tef1-α and rpb2 were amplified with the primer pairs EF1-728F [13] and TEF1LLErev [14] and fRPB2-5f/7cr [15], respectively. Each PCR reaction consisted of 12.5 µL Premix Taq™ (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 1.0 µL of forward primer (10 µM), 1.0 µL of reverse primer (10 µM), 1.5 µL of DNA, and 9 µL of double-sterilized water. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions followed Zhu and Zhuang [16]. The products were purified and subjected to sequencing on an ABI 3730 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Bedford, MA, USA) at SinoGenoMax company. Sequences generated from this study and those retrieved from GenBank are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Materials including strain numbers and GenBank accessions of sequences used for phylogenetic analyses.

Species Voucher GenBank Accession Number
rpb2 tef1-α
T. achlamydosporum YMF 1.6177 MT052180 MT070156
T. afarasin CBS 130755 AF348093
T. afarasin DIS 314F FJ442778 FJ463400
T. afroharzianum CBS 124620 ET FJ442691 FJ463301
T. afroharzianum GJS 04-193 FJ442709 FJ463298
T. aggregatum HMAS 248863 KY688001 KY688062
T. aggregatum HMAS 248864 KY688002 KY688063
T. aggressivum CBS 100525 AF545541 AF348095
T. aggressivum DAOM 222156 ET FJ442752 AF348098
T. alni CBS 120633 ET EU498349 EU498312
T. alpinum HMAS 248821 T KY687958 KY688012
T. amazonicum IB95 HM142368 HM142377
T. amazonicum CBS126898 ET HM142367 HM142376
T. anaharzianum YMF 1.00241 MH262577 MH236493
T. anaharzianum YMF 1.00383 T MH158995 MH183182
T. asiaticum YMF 1.00168 MH262575 MH236492
T. asiaticum YMF 1.00352 T MH158994 MH183183
T. atrobrunneum GJS90-254 FJ442735 AF443943
T. atrobrunneum GJS 05-101 FJ442745 FJ463392
T. atrogelatinosum CBS 237.63 ET KJ842201
T. atroviride CBS 119499 FJ860518 FJ860611
T. auriculariae JZBQT1Z7 T ON649949 ON649896
T. auriculariae JZBQT1Z8 ON649950 ON649897
T. auriculariae JZBQT1Z9 ON649951 ON649898
T. austroindianum BAFC 3583 MH352421
T. azevedoi CEN1422 MK696821 MK696660
T. bannaense HMAS 248840 T KY687979 KY688037
T. bannaense HMAS 248865 KY688003 KY688038
T. botryosum COAD 2422 MK044212 MK044119
T. botryosum COAD 2401 MK044181 MK044088
T. breve HMAS 248844 T KY687983 KY688045
T. breve HMAS 248845 KY687984 KY688046
T. brunneoviride CBS 121130 EU498357 EU498316
T. brunneoviride CBS 120928 EU498358 EU498318
T. caeruloviride COAD 2416 MK044201 MK044108
T. caeruloviride COAD 2415 MK044202 MK044109
T. camerunense GJS 99-230 AF348107
T. catoptron GJS 02-76 T AY391900 AY737726
T. ceraceum GJS 95-159 AF545508 AY937437
T. ceratophylletum YMF 1.04621 T MK327580 MK327579
T. cerinum DAOM 230012 KJ842184 KJ871242
T. christiani CBS 132572 ET KJ665244 KJ665439
T. cinnamomeum GJS 96-128 AY391916 AY391977
T. cinnamomeum GJS 97-233 AY391919 AY391978
T. compactum CBS 121218 KF134789 KF134798
T. concentricum HMAS 248833 KY687971 KY688027
T. confertum HMAS 248893 MF371203 MF371218
T. confertum HMAS 248896 MF371205 MF371220
T. corneum GJS 97-82 ET KJ665252 KJ665455
T. dacrymycellum WU29044 FJ860533 FJ860633
T. endophyticum CBS 130753 FJ442722 FJ463326
T. endophyticum CBS 130733 FJ442690 FJ463330
T. epimyces CBS120534 ET EU498360 EU498320
T. ganodermatigerum CCMJ5245 T ON567189 ON567195
T. ganodermatigerum CCMJ5246 ON567190 ON567196
T. ganodermatigerum CCMJ5247 ON567191 ON567197
T. globoides HMAS 248747 KX026963 KX026955
T. guizhouense HGUP0038 T JQ901400 JN215484
T. guizhouense S278 KF134791 KF134799
T. guizhouense DAOM 231435 EF191321
T. harzianum CBS 226-95 AF545549 AF348101
T. harzianum GJS 05 107 FJ442708 FJ463329
T. hausknechtii CBS 133493 KJ665276 KJ665515
T. helicolixii CBS 133499 KJ665278 KJ665517
T. hengshanicum HMAS 248852 T KY687991 KY688054
T. hirsutum HMAS 248834 T KY687972 KY688029
T. hortense BMCC LU994 KJ871185
T. ingratum HMAS 248822 KY687973 KY688018
T. inhamatum CBS 273-78 FJ442725 AF348099
T. italicum CBS 132567 KJ665282 KJ665525
T. koreanum SFC20131005-S066 MH025988 MH025979
T. lentiforme DIS 253B FJ442756 FJ851875
T. lentiforme DIS 94D FJ442749 FJ463379
T. lentinulae HMAS 248256 MN605867 MN605878
T. lentinulae CGMCC 3.19848 MN605868 MN605879
T. liberatum HMAS 248831 T KY687969 KY688025
T. linzhiense HMAS 248846 T KY687985 KY688047
T. lixii CBS 110080 KJ665290 FJ716622
T. longifialidicum LESF 552 KT278955 KT279020
T. miyunense JZBQF5 ON649968 ON649915
T. miyunense JZBQF7 T ON649969 ON649916
T. miyunense JZBQF9 ON649970 ON649917
T. neotropicale LA11 ET HQ022771
T. paratroviride S385 KJ665321 KJ665627
T. parepimyces CBS 122769 ET FJ860562 FJ860664
T. peberdyi CEN1426 MK696825 MK696664
T. peruvianum CP15-2 MW480153 MW480145
T. peruvianum CP15-9 MW480154 MW480146
T. perviride HMAS 273786 KX026962 KX026954
T. phayaoense SDBR-CMU349 MW002074 MW002073
T. pholiotae JZBQH11 ON649971 ON649918
T. pholiotae JZBQH12 T ON649972 ON649919
T. pholiotae JZBQH13 ON649973 ON649920
T. pinicola KACC 48486 ET MH025993 MH025981
T. pinicola SFC20130926-S014 MH025991 MH025978
T. pleuroti CBS 124387 ET HM142372 HM142382
T. pleuroticola CBS 124383 ET HM142371 HM142381
T. pleuroticola TRS70 ET KP009172 KP008951
T. pollinicola LC11682 = LF1542 ET MF939604 MF939619
T. pollinicola LC11686 = LF2050 MF939605 MF939620
T. polypori HMAS 248855 T KY687994 KY688058
T. priscilae CBS 131487 ET KJ665333 KJ665691
T. propepolypori YMF 1.06224 T MT052181 MT070158
T. propepolypori YMF 1.06199 MT052182 MT070157
T. pseudoasiaticum YMF 1.06200 T MT052183 MT070155
T. pseudodensum HMAS 248828 T KY687967 KY688023
T. pseudogelatinosum CNUN309 ET HM920173 HM920202
T. pseudopyramidale COAD 2419 MK044206 MK044113
T. pseudopyramidale COAD 2506 MK044207 MK044114
T. purpureum HMAS 273787 T KX026961 KX026953
T. pyramidale CBS 135574 ET KJ665334 KJ665699
T. rifaii CBS 130746 FJ463324
T. rifaii DIS 337F FJ442720 FJ463321
T. rufobrunneum HMAS 266614 T KF730010 KF729989
T. rugulosum SFC20180301-001 T MH025986 MH025984
T. rugulosum SFC20180301-002 MH025987 MH025985
T. simile YMF 1.06201 T MT052184 MT070154
T. simile YMF 1.06202 MT052185 MT070153
T. simmonsii CBS 130431 FJ442757 AF443935
T. simmonsii S7 KJ665337 KJ665719
T. simplex HMAS 248842 T KY687981 KY688041
T. solum HMAS 248848 T KY687987 KY688050
T. stramineum GJS 02-84 AY391945 AY391999
T. subalni HMAS 275683 MH612371 MH612377
T. subalni HMAS 275684 MH612370 MH612376
T. syagri BAFC 4357 MG822711
T. tawa CBS 114233 ET AY391956 FJ463313
T. tawa DAOM 232841 KJ842187 EU279972
T. tenue HMAS 273785 ET KX026960 KX026952
T. tomentosum DAOM 178713a AF545557 AY750882
T. velutinum CPK 298 KF134794 KJ665769
T. velutinum DAOM 230013 ET JN133569 AY937415
T. vermifimicola CGMCC 3.19850 MN605870 MN605881
T. vermifimicola HMAS 248255 MN605871 MN605882
T. xixiacum HMAS 248253 T MN605874 MN605885
T. xixiacum CGMCC 3.19698 MN605875 MN605886
T. zayuense HMAS 248835 T KY687974 KY688031
T. zelobreve HMAS 248254 T MN605872 MN605883
T. zelobreve CGMCC 3.19696 MN605873 MN605884
T. zeloharzianum YMF 1.00268 MH158996 MH183181

Numbers in bold indicate newly submitted sequences in this study. T: type strains. ET: ex-type strains.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

Sequences for all isolates generated in this study were blasted against the NCBIs GenBank nucleotide datasets (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and MIST (http://mmit.china-cctc.org/index.php) [17] to obtain an initial identification. To identify the phylogenetic positions of Trichoderma species isolated from contaminated substrates of edible fungi, rpb2 and tef1-α sequences of all Trichoderma species belonging to the Harzianum clade were combined for the analyses, with T. atroviride and T. paratroviride selected as outgroup taxa. Their sequences of type or ex-type strains based on previous publications were downloaded from NCBI database and assembled using BioEdit 7.0.5.3 [18]. Alignment was generated and converted to nexus files with Clustal X 1.83 [19].

Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was performed with PAUP 4.0b10. Starting trees were obtained via random stepwise addition with 1000 replicates and subsequent branch-swapping algorithm using tree bisection–reconnection (TBR) [20]. Analyses were performed with all characters treated as unordered and unweighted, and gaps treated as missing data. MaxTrees was set to 1000, and branches collapsed when maximum branch length was zero. Maximum parsimony bootstrap proportion (MPBP) was calculated to test topological confidence of the resulting trees.

Bayesian inference (BI) trees were calculated using MrBayes v. 3.1.2 [21]. The best-fit nucleotide substitution model GTR+I+G was selected using MrModeltest 2.3 [22]. Four chains were run from random trees for 6,000,000 generations and sampled every 100 generations. The first 25% of trees were discarded as the burn-in phase of the analyses, and Bayesian inference posterior probability (BIPP) was determined from the remaining trees. Trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.3 [23].

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

The partition homogeneity test of rpb2 and tef1-α sequences indicated that the individual partitions were generally congruent (p = 0.01). The combined rpb2 and tef1-α dataset was subsequently used for phylogenetic analysis to determine the positions of the new species. In MP analysis, the dataset contained 140 taxa and 2307 characters, of which 1468 characters were constant, 150 variable characters were parsimony uninformative, and 689 were parsimony informative. Five most parsimonious trees with the same topology were generated, and one of them is shown in Figure 1 (tree length = 3091, CI = 0.3999, HI = 0.6001, RC = 0.3039, and RI = 0.7600). The BI tree topology was generally the same as that of the MP tree.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Maximum parsimony phylogram of the investigated Trichoderma species inferred from the combined sequences of rpb2 and tef1-α. MPBP above 50% (left) and BIPP above 90% (right) are indicated at the nodes. New species proposed are indicated in red font. Trichoderma species isolated from substrate or fruiting bodies of edible fungi are marked with ▲.

A total of 140 sequences representing 95 Trichoderma species, including our three new species, were used for constructing the phylogenetic tree, and T. atroviride and T. paratroviride were used as outgroups. Results showed that all the investigated Trichoderma species formed a strongly supported group (MPBP/BIPP = 100%/100%), which was generally congruent with the previous studies [24].

In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), T. auriculariae, T. miyunense, and T. pholiotae were newly added to the T. harzianum clade. Trichoderma auriculariae was distributed as a separate terminal branch (MPBP/BIPP = 100%/100%) among T. vermifimicola and T. xixiacum. Trichoderma miyunense was a sister of T. ganodermatigerum (MPBP/BIPP = 98%/100%). Trichoderma pholiotae formed a linage with T. asiaticum, T. guizhouense, T. pseudoasiaticum, and T. simile with high support value (MPBP/BIPP = 92%/100%), and our three strains of T. pholiotae were distributed as a highly supported separate terminal branch (MPBP/BIPP = 100%/100%) among T. pseudoasiaticum and T. guizhouense.

3.2. Taxonomy

Trichoderma auriculariae Z. J. Cao and W.T. Qin, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB845141 (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Trichoderma auriculariae (JZBQT1Z7). Cultures at 25 °C after 7 days on (A) CMD, (B) SNA, and (C) PDA; (D,I,J) conidiophores and phialides; (E,F) conidiation pustules on CMD after 7 days; (G) conidia; (H,K) chlamydospores. Scale bars: (D,I) = 10 µm, (G,H,J,K) = 5 µm.

Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the host from which the fungus was isolated.

Typification: China, Beijing, Tongzhou, from the contaminated substrates of Auricularia heimuer, 26 August 2021, W.T. Qin, Z.J. Cao, L. Gao, J. Li (ex-type strain JZBQT1Z7).

DNA barcodes: ITS = ON653396, rpb2 = ON649949, tef1-α = ON649896.

On CMD after 72 h, colony radius 65–66 mm at 25 °C, 69–70 mm at 30 °C, and 8–10 mm at 35 °C. Colony hyaline and radial, not zonate. Aerial hyphae rare in colony center. A large number of white pustules formed after 2 days. Conidiation formed on aerial hyphae and in pustules, abundant, spreaded throughout the colony, then gradually turned green. No diffusing pigment noted.

On PDA after 72 h, colony radius 47–49 mm at 25 °C, 66–68 mm 30 °C, and 5–7 mm at 35 °C. Colony regularly circular, distinctly zonate. Aerial mycelium dense and radial, forming a dense, zonate, floccose mat. Conidial production noted after 2 days, starting around the original inoculum, effuse in aerial hyphae, more abundant along the original inoculum. No diffusing pigment noted, odor fruity.

On SNA after 72 h, colony radius 47–49 mm at 25 °C, 51–55 mm at 30 °C, and 5–7 mm at 35 °C. Colony hyaline, mycelium loose. Conidial production noted after 2 days, starting around the inoculum, effuse in the aerial hyphae, forming a few inconspicuous rings. Small pustules formed around the inoculum, first white, turning green after 3 days, with hairs protruding beyond the surface. No diffusing pigment.

Conidiophores pyramidal, with opposing branches borne on a conspicuously broad spindle, less solitary. The main axis and branches terminating in 3–5 cruciate to nearly verticillate disposed phialides. Hyphal septa clearly visible. Phialides ampulliform, sometime lageniform, 4.6–9.9 × (2.2–) 2.7–3.8 µm, l/w 1.4–3.5 (–4.4), 1.4–2.7 µm wide at the base (n = 50). Conidia green, globose or subglobose, sometimes ellipsoidal, smooth, 2.7–3.8 × 2.3–3.1 µm, l/w 1.0–1.3 (n = 50). Chlamydospores common, intercalary or terminal, variable in shape, ellipsoid, globose or oblong, 4.6–7.5 × 3.8–6.3 µm (n = 20).

Additional strains examined: China, Beijing, Tongzhou, from the contaminated substrates of A. heimuer, 26 August 2021, W.T. Qin, Y. Liu, S.X. Wang, JZBQT1Z8; ibid., JZBQT1Z9.

Notes: Phylogenetically, T. auriculariae formed a separate group (MPBP/BIPP = 100%/100%) in the Harzianum clade among T. vermifimicola and T. xixiacum. The tef1-α sequences between T. auriculariae and T. vermifimicola were very similar, but they shared 28 bp divergent among 1117 bp for rpb2 sequences (97.49%). Phylogenetically, T. auriculariae shared a common ancestor with T. xixiacum, T. vermifimicola, and T. simmonsi. Trichoderma auriculariae shared typical characteristics of the Harzianum clade in pyramidal conidiophores comprising a long main axis, and 3–5 phialides in whorls arose at the tips of the branches. However T. auriculariae had longer phialides and grew much slower at 35 °C on PDA than T. simmonsi [5.2–6.5 mm, 25–55 mm] [25] and had larger conidia than that of T. vermifimicola [2.3–2.6 × 2.0–2.4 µm] and T. xixiacum [2.3–2.7 × 2.0–2.6] [24]. Meanwhile, chlamydospores were common in T. auriculariae (Table S1).

Trichoderma miyunense Z. J. Cao and W.T. Qin, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB845142 (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Trichoderma miyunense (JZBQF9). Cultures at 25 °C after 7 days on (A) CMD, (B) SNA, and (C) PDA; (D,F,H) conidiophores and phialides; (E,G) conidiation pustules on SNA after 7 days; (I) chlamydospores. Scale bars: (D,H) = 10 µm, (F,I) = 5 µm.

Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the type locality.

Typification: China, Beijing, Miyun, from the contaminated substrates of Auricularia heimuer, 9 September 2020, Y. Liu, W.T. Qin, S. Song (ex-type strain JZBQF9).

DNA barcodes: ITS = ON653404, rpb2 = ON649970, tef1-α = ON649917.

On CMD after 72 h, colony radius 51–52 mm at 25 °C and 65–66 mm at 30 °C. No growth at 35 °C. Colony hyaline, weak, regularly circular, distinctly zonate. Conidiation first formed in white pustules on aerial hyphae, turned green after a few days. No diffusing pigment noted, odor slightly fruity.

On PDA after 72 h, colony radius 42–43 mm at 25 °C and 51–54 mm at 30 °C. No growth at 35 °C. Mycelium white, aerial along the edge, irregularly circular, less with sporulation. No diffusing pigment noted, odor slightly fruity.

On SNA after 72 h, colony radius 30–33 mm at 25 °C and 25–29 mm at 30 °C. No growth at 35 °C. Mycelium hyaline and smooth, dark green to light green pustules, irregular in shape, relatively abundant in the zonation regions, with the formation of 2–3 concentric rings. Aerial hyphae short and inconspicuous. No diffusing pigment, no distinct odor.

Conidiophores pyramidal, with a relatively obvious main axis, multiple branches unpaired, with the longest branches near the base of the main axis. Branches perpendicular to the main axis or at acute angles with the main axis, with septa conspicuous and producing barrel-shaped or cylindrical metulae. Phialides densely disposed at the terminal of branches, often formed in whorls of 2–4, variable in shape and size, ampulliform to lageniform, (5.2–) 5.6–9.7 (–10.3) × 1.9–3.2 (–3.7) µm, l/w 1.9–4.4, 1.0–2.1 (–2.6) wide at the base (n = 80). Conidia green, smooth, ellipsoid, sometimes globose to subglobose, 2.2–3.4 × (1.8–) 2–2.9 µm, l/w 1–1.3 (–1.4) (n = 80). Chlamydospores unobserved.

Additional strains examined: China, Beijing, Miyun, from the contaminated substrates of Auricularia heimuer, 9 September 2020, W.T. Qin, Y. Liu, S. Song, JZBQF5; ibid., JZBQF7.

Notes: Phylogenetically, T. miyunense formed a sister group with T. ganodermatigerum (Figure 1). They shared 36 bp divergent among 1132 bp for rpb2 sequences (96.82%) and 35 bp divergent among 1102 bp for tef1-α sequences (96.82%). Morphologically, compared to T. miyunense, T. ceratophylletum possessed shorter phialides (4.1–8.4 µm) and lesser l/w of phialides [(1.0–) 1.2–2.8 (–3.2) µm] [26], while T. ganodermatigerum had larger conidia [(3.4–) 3.6–4.8 (–5.3) × (2.9–) 3.2–4.3 (–4.6)], and the optimum temperature was 25 °C [27]. T. miyunense was distinctly different from T. caeruloviride, which possessed abundant chlamydospores on CMD after 4 days with no concentric rings present [28]. In contrast, T. confertum had slightly larger phialides [8.3–12.5 × 2.5–4.2 µm] [29], T. amazonicum had distinctly wider phialides [3.3–3.5 µm] and chlamydospore-like structures in the clusters, and T. pleuroticola featured diffuse brown pigment and yellow crystals on PDA [30] (Table S2).

Trichoderma pholiotae Z.J. Cao & W.T. Qin, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB845143 (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Trichoderma pholiotae (JZBQH12). Cultures at 25 °C after 7 days on (A) CMD, (B) SNA, and (C) PDA; (D,E) conidiation pustules on SNA after 7 days; (F) chlamydospores; (GI) conidiophores and phialides; (J) conidia. Scale bars: (F,J) = 5 µm, (GI) = 10 µm.

Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the host from which the fungus was isolated.

Typification: China, Beijing, Haidian, from the contaminated substrates of Pholiota adipose, 25 September 2020, W.T. Qin, Z.J. Cao, L. Gao, J. Li (ex-type strain JZBQH12).

DNA barcodes: ITS = ON653405, rpb2 = ON649972, tef1-α = ON649919.

On CMD after 72 h, colony radius 71–72 mm at 25 °C, 73–74 mm at 30 °C, and 13–18 mm at 35 °C. Colonies hyaline, fan-shaped, tending to aggregate toward the distal parts of the colony. Aerial hyphae loose, sparse, radial. Conidiation effuse in aerial hyphae or in loosely disposed pustules. Pustules minute, irregular in shape, relatively abundant in the zonation regions, formed concentric rings around the outer ring, white at first, then gradually green. No diffusing pigment noted, odor slightly fruity.

On PDA after 72 h, colony radius 67–68 mm at 25 °C, 70–72 mm at 30 °C, and 8–10 mm at 35 °C. Colonies white in the center, with the zone around the central part of the colony forming a distinct circular and green part. Aerial hyphae distinctly radial, abundant, dense, floccose to cottony. Light diffusing yellow pigment, odor slightly fruity.

On SNA after 72 h, colony radius 49–50 mm at 25 °C, 54–55 mm at 30 °C, and 8–10 mm at 35 °C. Colonies translucent and round-like. Aerial hyphae short, radial distribution. Pustules abundant, irregular in shape, from white to green, with the formation of concentric rings. No diffusing pigment noted.

Conidiophores typically pyramidal with opposing branches, formed densely intricate reticulum, with one terminal whorl of generally 3–4 phialides and mostly paired side branches, less frequently solitary. Branches mostly perpendicular to the main axis with septa conspicuous. Phialides varied, borne in regular levels around the axis, some regular ampulliform or lageniform and others apex and inequilateral to curved, (4.1–) 4.9–10.9 (–11.6) × 2.4–4.2 (–5.0) µm, l/w 1.4–3.4 (–3.9), (1.3–) 1.4–3.1 (–3.4) µm wide at the base (n = 100). Conidia elliptic to subspheroidal, less globose, green, smooth, 2.6–3.8 (–4.2) × 2.4–3.3 (–3.5) µm, l/w 1–1.3 (n = 80). Chlamydospores common, intercalary or terminal, ellipsoid, globose, 5.0–7.4 (8.3) × (3.9–) 4.9–7.0 µm (n = 25).

Additional strains examined: China, Beijing, Haidian, from the contaminated substrates of Pholiota adipose, 25 September 2020, W.T. Qin, Z.J. Cao, L. Gao, J. Li, JZBQH11; ibid., JZBQH13.

Notes: Phylogenetically, T. pholiotae formed a linage with T. asiaticum, T. guizhouense, T. pseudoasiaticum, and T. simile with high support value (MPBP/BIPP = 92%/100%), and our three strains of T. pholiotae were distributed as a highly supported separate terminal branch (MPBP/BIPP = 100%/100%) among T. pseudoasiaticum and T. guizhouense in the Harzianum clade. However, compared to T. pholiotae, T. guizhouense possessed thinner phialides [2.0–3.0 µm] and globose conidia [31]. T. simile had distinct lower optimum growth temperature (25 °C) in the three media, and T. asiaticum had shorter phialides [(3.0–) 4.0–6.0 (–7.0) µm] [12]. In addition, T. pholiotae and T. pseudoasiaticum could be distinguished by the branching pattern, with T. pholiotae being pyramidal and T. pseudoasiaticum being verticillium-like (Table S3).

4. Discussion

During exploration of contaminated substrates of edible fungi in North China, 39 strains representing 10 Trichoderma species were isolated from four kinds of edible fungi and examined, and three new species were recognized based on integrated studies of phenotypic and molecular data (Table S1). To explore their taxonomic positions, a phylogenetic tree containing all species of the Harzianum clade was constructed based on analyses of the combined sequences of rpb2 and tef1-α. The three new species were well located in the Harzianum clade with separate terminal branches and were clearly distinguishable from any of the existing species. The results of this study have a number of practical implications to identify and diagnose Trichoderma species contaminating edible fungi. This work provides useful information on the epidemiological and geographical distribution of Trichoderma, which will help in the development of targeted interventions aimed at comprehensive management and control of green mold contamination of edible fungi.

With further study of Trichoderma classification, researchers have reached a consensus that accurate identification of Trichoderma species cannot depend only on the morphological identification as sometimes there is high ambiguity in the morphological features of Trichoderma spp. [32,33]. Trichoderma spp. isolated from the fruiting bodies or substrates of edible fungi is usually anamorph with high morphological similarity with many species, which is not conducive to identification. With DNA-based techniques gradually perfected and widely used, the integrative (polyphasic) taxonomy approach for species delimitation is recommended, including the combination of genealogy and multiparametric phenotypes [34,35], especially for examining the presence of species complexes and cryptic species [31]. Therefore, we hypothesized that T. harzianum, which was originally identified by ITS sequence and morphology in previous studies, probably belonged to the T. harzianum complex. However, the present study showed that the complex still contained many taxa, indicating that the previous identification was not accurate. Furthermore, it is also difficult to identify species of the Harzianum clade according to exclusive tef1-α or rpb2 sequence data [24,25]. Therefore, the combination of tef1-α and rpb2 sequences for phylogenetic analysis is highly recommended to identify species in the Harzianum clade.

Taxonomy of Trichoderma dates back to the late 18th century [36], and some of them cause economic losses in commercial mushroom farms [37]. Over more than a century, successive findings have brought the number of known species of the genus to over 441 [1,23,38]. Trichoderma species are located throughout the world, and more than 30 of them are mushroom inhabiting (Figure 1, Table 2). They are isolated from the substrate or fruiting bodies of Agaricus bisporus, Lentinula edodes, Pleurotus ostreatus, Ganoderma lingzhi, etc. and are mainly located in the Harzianum, Longibrachiatum, and Viride clades [39]. There may still be many unknown Trichoderma species associated with the growth of edible fungi and their related living environment. The phylogenetical difference between Trichoderma spp. on edible fungi substrates and from other sources deserves further analysis.

Table 2.

Trichoderma spp. associated with the contaminated substrates of edible fungi.

Species Cultivated Mushroom Reference
T. aggressivum Agaricus bisporus [40,41]
T. asperellum A. bisporus [9,42]
T. atroviride L. edodes, Pleurotus ostreatus, A. bisporus, Ganoderma lingzhi [8,9,43]
T. aureoviride Auricularia heimuer, Flammulina filiformis, L. edodes [44]
T. breve L. edodes [45]
T. capillare Agaricus sp. [46]
T. citrinviride L. edodes, P. ostreatus [43,47]
T. deliquescens L. edodes [11]
T. ganodermatigerum G. sichuanense [27]
T. ghanense A. bisporus [9]
T. guizhouense P. ostreatus [48]
T. hamatum A. bisporus [49]
T. harzianum L. edodes, A. bisporus, P. ostreatus, Agrocybe aegerita [43,50]
T. hengshanicum G. lingzhi [51]
T. hirsutum L. edodes [45]
T. koningii P. ostreatus, A. bisporus [37,40]
T. koningiopsis Dictyophora rubrovolvata, P. eryngii [52,53]
T. lentinulae L. edodes [24]
T. longibrachiatum L. edodes, P. ostreatus, A. aegerita [9,43,50]
T. oblongisporum L. edodes [54]
T. patella P. ostreatus [55]
T. pleuroti P. ostreatus [56]
T. pleuroticola P. ostreatus, L. edodes, G. lingzhi [50,54,56]
T. polysporum L. edodes [57]
T. pseudogelatinosum L. edodes [58]
T. pseudokoningii P. ostreatus [37]
T. pseudolacteum L. edodes [59]
T. pseudostramineum L. edodes [58]
T. reesei P. ostreatus [60]
T. stramineum L. edodes [57]
T. stromaticum A. bisporus [49]
T. virens P. ostreatus, A. bisporus [37,40]
T. viride L. edodes [54]

Analysis of the biological characteristics of Trichoderma species from contaminated substrates showed that the optimum growth temperature of many Trichoderma species was generally around 30 °C, which was consistent with the phenomenon that contamination of Trichoderma on edible fungi is more likely to occur at high temperatures. Therefore, reasonable control the growth environment temperature of edible fungi may be a reasonable approach to prevent or delay the outbreak of Trichoderma contamination during production. More broadly, research is also needed to analyze the mechanism of occurrence of Trichoderma spp. contamination, such as the correlation between contamination occurrence and the growth environment of edible fungi.

With the increased number of species joining the Harzianum clade, understanding of Trichoderma spp. will become more sophisticated and intelligible, and reasonable species concepts will be firmly established. Accumulated knowledge of Trichoderma, especially the Harzianum clade, will provide useful information for sufficient utilization of resources and for the prevention of contamination of edible fungi.

5. Conclusions

In this study, 39 strains belonging to 10 Trichoderma species isolated from four kinds of edible fungi in North China were obtained, and three novel species belonging to the Harzianum clade were isolated from the contaminated substrates of Auricularia heimuer and Pholiota adipose. More than 30 mushroom-inhabiting Trichoderma species throughout the world mainly located in the Harzianum, Longibrachiatum, and Viride clades were indicated. This study enrich the biodiversity of Trichoderma and provide important support for systematic development of the Harzianum clade.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Xing-Hong Li and Wei Zhang for technical assistance and thankful to all the sample collectors in this study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8111154/s1. Table S1: Strain information and their accession numbers. Table S2: Comparison of the morphological characteristics of Trichoderma auriculariae and its relatives. Table S3: Comparison of the morphological characteristics of Trichoderma miyunense and its relatives. Table S4: Comparison of the morphological characteristics of Trichoderma pholiotae and its relatives. Table S5: The growth rate of three new species in this study incubated at different temperatures and media.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-T.Q. and S.-Y.Z.; methodology, W.-T.Q.; software, Z.-J.C. and J.Z.; validation, W.-T.Q. and Y.L.; formal analysis, Z.-J.C.; investigation, Z.-J.C. and S.-X.W.; data curation, Z.-J.C. and J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.-J.C.; writing—review and editing, W.-T.Q. and S.-Y.Z.; visualization, Z.-J.C. and J.Z.; supervision, W.-T.Q. and S.-X.W.; project administration, W.-T.Q. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, W.-T.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, China (KJCX20220415), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32002106), and the Rural Revitalization Project of Beijing Municipal Bureau of Agriculture (BJXCZX20221229).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Cai F., Druzhinina I.S. In honor of John Bissett: Authoritative guidelines on molecular identification of Trichoderma. Fungal Divers. 2021;107:1–69. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00464-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Druzhinina I.S., Seidl-Seiboth V., Herrera-Estrella A., Horwitz B.A., Kenerley C.M., Monte E., Mukherjee P.K., Zeilinger S., Grigoriev I.V., Kubicek C.P. Trichoderma: The genomics of opportunistic success. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;9:749–759. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nuangmek W., Aiduang W., Kumla J., Lumyong S., Suwannarach N. Evaluation of a newly identified endophytic fungus, Trichoderma phayaoense for plant growth promotion and biological control of gummy stem blight and wilt of muskmelon. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:634772. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.634772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carillo P., Woo S.L., Comite E., El-Nakhel C., Vinale F. Application of Trichoderma harzianum, 6-pentyl-α-pyrone and plant biopolymer formulations modulate plant metabolism and fruit quality of plum tomatoes. Plants. 2020;9:771. doi: 10.3390/plants9060771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wei H., Wu M., Fan A., Su H. Recombinant protein production in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2021;30:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2020.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gupta S., Smith P., Boughton B., Twt R., Sha N., Roessner U. Inoculation of barley with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 modifies lipids and metabolites to improve salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2021;72:7229–7246. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Samuel G.J., Dodd S.L., Gams W., Castlebury L.A., Petrini O. Trichoderma species associated with the green mold epidemic of commercially grown Agaricus bisporus. Mycologia. 2002;94:146–170. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2003.11833257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yan Y., Zhang C., Moodley O., Zhang L., Xu J. Green mold caused by Trichoderma atroviride on the lingzhi medicinal mushroom, Ganoderma lingzhi (Agaricomycetes) Int. J. Med. Mushrooms. 2019;21:515–521. doi: 10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.2019030352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hatvani L., Antal Z., Manczinger L., Szekeres A., Druzhinina I.S., Kubicek C.P., Nagy A., Nagy E., Vagvolgyi C., Kredics L. Green mold diseases of Agaricus and Pleurotus spp. are caused by related but phylogenetically different Trichoderma species. Phytopathology. 2007;97:532–537. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Komon-Zelazowska M., Bissett J., Zafari D., Hatvani L., Manczinger L., Woo S., Lorito M., Kredics L., Kubicek C.P., Druzhinina I.S. Genetically closely related but phenotypically divergent Trichoderma species cause green mold disease in oyster mushroom farms worldwide. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2007;73:7415–7426. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01059-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim J.Y., Yun Y.H., Hyun M.W., Kim M.H., Kim S.H. Identification and characterization of Gliocladium viride isolated from mushroom fly infested oak log beds used for shiitake cultivation. Mycobiology. 2010;38:7–12. doi: 10.4489/MYCO.2010.38.1.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zheng H., Qiao M., Lv Y.F., Du X., Zhang K.Q., Yu Z.F. New species of Trichoderma isolated as endophytes and saprobes from southwest China. J. Fungi. 2021;7:467. doi: 10.3390/jof7060467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ignazio C., Linda M.K. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia. 1999;91:553–556. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jaklitsch W.M., Komon M., Kubicek C.P., Druzhinina I.S. Hypocrea voglmayrii sp. nov. from the Austrian Alps represents a new phylogenetic clade in Hypocrea/Trichoderma. Mycologia. 2005;97:1365–1378. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu Y.J., Whelen S., Hall B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999;16:1799–1808. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhu Z.X., Zhuang W.Y. Trichoderma (Hypocrea) species with green ascospores from China. Persoonia. 2015;34:113–129. doi: 10.3767/003158515X686732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dou K., Lu Z., Wu Q., Ni M., Yu C., Wang M., Li Y., Wang X., Xie H., Chen J., et al. MIST: A multilocus identification system for Trichoderma. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2020;86:e01532-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01532-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hall T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Higgins D.G., Jeanmougin F., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Thompson J.D. The Clustal X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Symp. 1997;25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Swofford D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, MA, USA: 2002. Version 4.0. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nylander J.A.A. MrModeltest v2. Program Distributed by the Author. 2004. [(accessed on 1 January 2018)]. Available online: http://paup.csit.fsu.edu.
  • 23.Rambaut A. FigTree. Tree Figure Drawing Tool, v. 1.4.3. 2016. [(accessed on 1 January 2018)]. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/
  • 24.Gu X., Wang R., Sun Q., Wu B., Sun J.-Z. Four new species of Trichoderma in the Harzianum clade from northern China. Mycokeys. 2020;73:109–132. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.73.51424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chaverri P., Branco-Rocha F., Jaklitsch W., Gazis R., Degenkolb T., Samuels G.J. Systematics of the Trichoderma harzianum species complex and the re-identification of commercial biocontrol strains. Mycologia. 2015;107:558–590. doi: 10.3852/14-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yuan H.S., Lu X., Dai Y.C., Hyde K.V.D., Kan Y.H., Kusan I., He S.H., Liu N.G., Sarma V.V., Zhao C.L., et al. Fungal diversity notes 1277–1386: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2020;104:1–266. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00461-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.An X.Y., Cheng G.H., Gao H.X., Li D., Li Y. Phylogenetic analysis of trichoderma species associated with green mold disease on mushrooms and two new pathogens on Ganoderma sichuanense. J. Fungi. 2022;8:704. doi: 10.3390/jof8070704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodriguez M.D.H., Evans H.C., De Abreu L.M., De Macedo D.M., Ndacnou M.K., Bekele K.B., Barreto R.W. New species and records of Trichoderma isolated as mycoparasites and endophytes from cultivated and wild coffee in Africa. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:5671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84111-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen K., Zhuang W.Y. Seven new species of Trichoderma from soil in China. Mycosystema. 2017;36:1441–1462. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chaverri P., Gazis R.O., Samuels G.J. Trichoderma amazonicum, a new endophytic species on Hevea brasiliensis and H. guianensis from the Amazon basin. Mycologia. 2011;103:139–151. doi: 10.3852/10-078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li Q.R., Tan P., Jiang Y.L., Hyde K.D., Mckenzie E.H.C., Bahkali A.H., Kang J.C., Wang Y. A novel Trichoderma species isolated from soil in Guizhou, T. guizhouense. Mycol. Prog. 2013;12:167–172. doi: 10.1007/s11557-012-0821-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chaverri P., Samuels G.J. Hypocrea/Trichoderma (Ascomycota, Hypocreales, Hypocreaceae): Species with green ascospores. Stud. Mycol. 2003;48:1–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jaklitsch W.M., Samuels G.J., Dodd S.L., Lu B.S., Druzhinina I.S. Hypocrea rufa/Trichoderma viride: A reassessment, and description of five closely related species with and without warted conidia. Stud. Mycol. 2006;56:135–177. doi: 10.3114/sim.2006.56.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Luecking R., Aime M.C., Robbertse B., Miller A.N., Ariyawansa H.A., Aoki T., Cardinali G., Crous P.W., Druzhinina I.S., Geiser D.M., et al. Unambiguous identification of fungi: Where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding? IMA Fungus. 2020;11:14. doi: 10.1186/s43008-020-00033-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Druzhinina I., Kubicek C.P. Species concepts and biodiversity in Trichoderma and Hypocrea: From aggregate species to species clusters? J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2005;6:100–112. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2005.B0100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Persoon C.H. Neurospora genetic nomenclature. Romers Neues Mag. Bot. 1794;1:81–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jhune C.S., Leem H.T., Park H.S., Lee C.J., Weon H.Y., Seok S.J., Yoo K.H., Sung G.H. Identification of oyster mushroom green mold pathogen that causes and pathological characteristics. J. Mushrooms. 2014;12:132–137. doi: 10.14480/JM.2014.12.2.132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barrera V.A., Iannone L., Romero A.I., Chaverri P. Expanding the Trichoderma harzianum species complex: Three new species from Argentine natural and cultivated ecosystems. Mycologia. 2021;113:1136–1155. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2021.1947641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Allaga H., Zhumakayev A., Buchner R., Kocsube S., Szucs A., Vagvolgyi C., Kredics L., Hatvani L. Members of the Trichoderma harzianum species complex with mushroom pathogenic potential. Agronomy. 2021;11:2434. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11122434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kosanovic D., Potocnik I., Duduk B., Vukojevic J., Stajic M., Rekanovic E., Milijasevic-Marcic S. Trichoderma species on Agaricus bisporus farms in Serbia and their biocontrol. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2013;163:218–230. doi: 10.1111/aab.12048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Marik T., Urban P., Tyagi C., Szekeres A., Leitgeb B., Vagvolgyi M., Manczinger L., Druzhinina I.S., Vagvolgyi C., Kredics L. Diversity profile and dynamics of peptaibols produced by green mould Trichoderma species in interactions with their hosts Agaricus bisporus and Pleurotus ostreatus. Chem. Biodivers. 2017;14:e1700033. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201700033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wu X.J., Hu F.P., He H.Z., Xie B.G. Identification of Trichoderma species associated with cultivated edible fungi. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2008;16:1048–1055. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim C.S., Park M.S., Kim S.C., Maekawa N., Yu S.H. Identification of Trichoderma, a competitor of shiitake mushroom (Lentinula edodes), and competition between Lentinula edodes and Trichoderma species in Korea. Plant Pathol. J. 2012;28:137–148. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.2012.28.2.137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cui L.H. Master’s Thesis. Liaoning Normal University; Dalian, China: 2017. Isolation, Identification and Diversity Analysis of the Contaminating Fungi from the Edible Mushroom-Growing Synthetic Wood Logs. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang Y. Master’s Thesis. Guizhou University; Guiyang, China: 2021. Identification of the Pathogen of Lentinus edodes Sticks Rot and Preliminary Study on Its Occurrence. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Samuels G.J., Ismaiel A., Mulaw T.B., Szakacs G., Druzhinina I.S., Kubicek C.P., Jaklitsch W.M. The Longibrachiatum clade of Trichoderma: A revision with new species. Fungal Divers. 2012;55:77–108. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0152-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Park M.S., Seo G.S., Bae K.S., Yu S.H. Characterization of Trichoderma spp. associated with green mold of oyster mushroom by PCR-RFLP and sequence analysis of ITS regions of rDNA. Plant Pathol. J. 2005;21:229–236. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.2005.21.3.229. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Innocenti G., Montanari M., Righini H., Roberti R. Trichoderma species associated with green mould disease of Pleurotus ostreatus and their sensitivity to prochloraz. Plant Pathol. 2019;68:392–398. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Song X.X., Wang Q., Jun J.X., Zhang J.J., Chen H., Chen M.J., Huang J.C., Xie B.Q. Study on accurate identification of four Trichoderma diseases in Agaricus bisporus in factory cultivation. Edible Fungi. 2019;41:67–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Choi I.Y., Choi J.N., Hyu L.W., Sharma P.K. Isolation and identification of mushroom pathogens from Agrocybe aegerita. Mycobiology. 2010;38:310–315. doi: 10.4489/MYCO.2010.38.4.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cai M., Idrees M., Zhou Y., Zhang C., Xu J. First report of green mold disease caused by Trichoderma hengshanicum on Ganoderma lingzhi. Mycobiology. 2020;48:427–430. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2020.1794230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen X., Zhou X., Zhao J., Tang X., Pasquali M., Migheli Q., Berg G., Cernava T. Occurrence of green mold disease on Dictyophora rubrovolvata caused by Trichoderma koningiopsis. J. Plant Pathol. 2021;103:981–984. doi: 10.1007/s42161-021-00861-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim S.W., Kim S., Lee H.J., Park J.W., Ro H.S. Isolation of fungal pathogens to an edible mushroom, Pleurotus eryngii, and development of specific ITS primers. Mycobiology. 2013;41:252–255. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2013.41.4.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wang G., Cao X., Ma X., Guo M., Liu C., Yan L., Bian Y. Diversity and effect of Trichoderma spp. associated with green mold disease on Lentinula edodes in China. Microbiologyopen. 2016;5:709–718. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hua R., Li J.Y., Liu S.X., Luo X.K., Wang X.Y., Liu C.L., Zhang L.Y., Sun D.F. Investigation on common dieases of Pleurotus ostreatus and identification of pathogens. Edible Fungi China. 2021;40:80–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Park M.S., Bae K.S., Yu S.H. Two new species of Trichoderma associated with green mold of oyster mushroom cultivation in Korea. Mycobiology. 2006;34:111–113. doi: 10.4489/MYCO.2006.34.3.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Miyazaki K., Tsuchiya Y., Okuda T. Specific PCR assays for the detection of Trichoderma harzianum causing green mold disease during mushroom cultivation. Mycoscience. 2009;50:94–99. doi: 10.1007/S10267-008-0460-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kim C.S., Yu S.H., Nakagiri A., Shirouzu T., Sotome K., Kim S.C., Maekawa N. Re-evaluation of Hypocrea pseudogelatinosa and H. pseudostraminea isolated from shiitake mushroom (Lentinula edodes) cultivation in Korea and Japan. Plant Pathol. J. 2012;28:341–356. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.05.2012.0068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kim C.S., Shirouzu T., Nakagiri A., Sotome K., Maekawa N. Trichoderma eijii and T. pseudolacteum, two new species from Japan. Mycol. Prog. 2013;12:739–753. doi: 10.1007/s11557-012-0886-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lan B.M. Isolation and identification of Trichoderma on oyster mushroom in Quanzhou. Chin. J. Trop. Agric. 2022;42:81–85. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES