Background.
Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) are at increased risk for severe disease from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared with non-SOTr.
Methods.
We performed a retrospective cohort study between March 1, 2020, and March, 30, 2021, in an integrated healthcare system with 4.3 million members aged ≥18 y including 5126 SOTr. Comparisons in COVID-19 mortality, hospitalization, and incidence were made between SOTr and non-SOTr, and between different SOTr organs. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for COVID-19 mortality and hospitalization.
Results.
There were 600 SOTr (kidney, liver, heart, and lung) with COVID-19. Per person-year incidence of COVID-19 among SOTr was 10.0% versus 7.6% among non-SOTr (P < 0.0001). Compared with uninfected SOTr, infected SOTr were older (57.1 ± 14.0 versus 45.7 ± 17.9 y, P < 0.001), predominantly Hispanic/Latino (58.8% versus 38.6%, P < 0.0001), hypertensive (77.0% versus 23.8%; P < 0.0001), and diabetic (49.6% versus 13.0%; P = 0.0009). Compared with non-SOTr, infected SOTr had higher hospitalization (39.5% versus 6.0%; P < 0.0001), intensive care unit admission (29.1% versus 15.5%; P < 0.0001), and mortality (14.7% versus 1.8%; P < 0.0001) from COVID-19. Older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.10), male gender (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.11-2.86), and higher body mass index (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P = 0.047) were associated with increased mortality from COVID-19, whereas race, diabetes, and number/type of immunosuppressive medications were not. Among the different SOTr, COVID-19 mortality risk was lowest in liver recipients (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16-0.73) and highest in lung recipients (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.68-4.42).
Conclusions.
SOTr have higher rates of hospitalization and mortality from COVID-19 compared with the general population. Among the SOTr, the incidence and outcomes were distinct among different transplantation types.
INTRODUCTION
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), led to a global pandemic as declared by World Health Organization in March 2020. Since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in December 2019, across the globe >520 million people have been affected, with 6 million deaths. In the United States, 82 million people have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, with 1 million deaths.1,2 The hallmark of the SARS-CoV2 is its ability to mutate rapidly, generating multiple variants of concern, the most recent being the Delta and Omicron variants leading to surges around the globe.3
Most infected persons with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or have mild disease and serve as the silent spreaders, whereas populations at high risk for complications may more likely develop moderate to severe illness.4 These high-risk groups, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, include persons aged ≥65 y; those with comorbidities, such as obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM); and those who are immunocompromised, including solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr).5 SOT patients on chronic immunosuppression and with other medical comorbidities may be at higher risk of complications from COVID-19.6 A recent study found that SOTr admitted for COVID-19 have higher odds of mortality compared with SOTr admitted for non–COVID-19 reasons.7
Although the impact of COVID-19 on SOTr has been reported, these have primarily been small case series of hospitalized SOTr.8-13 In Europe and the United States, the incidence of COVID-19 has been shown to be higher in SOTr than non-SOTr patients.10,13-15
Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) is the largest integrated health system in California and represents >16% of the population in the coverage area that reflects the socioeconomic diversity of the Southern California census population.16 With a single, comprehensive electronic health records (EHRs) system and access to medical care for all members, KPSC is an ideal population to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on recipients of different SOTr compared with the general population.
We report our findings from a large cohort of SOTr with different organs at the point of care diagnosis of COVID-19 to identify risk factors for hospitalization and death from COVID-19. The outcomes of the SOTr infected with SARS-CoV-2 were compared with the general population who were also infected.
Materials and Methods
Study Setting
This study was conducted at KPSC, with a population of 4.3 million active members aged ≥18 y across 15 large medical center areas and 235 medical offices that use a single EHR that collates demographic, services, diagnosis, and procedure data from outpatient, emergency room, and inpatient settings. KPSC members receive organ transplant surgeries at transplant centers in California and other states across the country. The care preceding and after organ transplantation is centralized within KPSC transplant physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. SARS-CoV-2 testing criteria at KPSC followed national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines—first with symptomatic patients then at will. During the pandemic, care was delivered to patients with COVID-19 remotely and in-person depending on the severity of illness. Patients with COVID-19 who were not hospitalized were followed by the KPSC COVID-19 home monitoring program.17 This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at KPSC.
Study Design
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on KPSC members aged >18 y who received SOT (defined kidney, liver, heart, or lung transplants) before December 31, 2020, and who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021, after transplantation. Laboratory data and International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes were used to identify patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined as any patient with a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus regardless of the presence of symptoms. Date of SARS-CoV-2 infection was based on the first positive PCR test. SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing data were extracted from EMR. Immunosuppression regimen recorded was at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. The denominator used to calculate incidence included all active SOTr aged >18 y who had received SOT before December 31, 2020. Follow-up data for outcomes were collected until July 31, 2021, for all patients. Information on time between the date of transplant and the onset of SARS-CoV-2 infection was captured. For SOTr without SARS-CoV-2 infection, December 31, 2020, was used as the reference date to calculate time from transplant.
Data for SARS-CoV-2 infection of the general KPSC population age ≥18 y during the study period were also collected for comparison. Demographic and clinical data for the general population were extracted from the EHR. Clinical data for SOTr cohort were obtained by chart review and KPSC transplant registry. Comparisons were made between KPSC general population and SOT populations without and with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further comparisons were made between the different SOTr by organ type. Subgroup analysis was performed on hospitalized patients.
Outcomes
The primary outcome was mortality from COVID-19 as determined by death registry information and clinical documentation. Mortality rate was defined as number of deaths per number of total confirmed cases. All-cause mortality was calculated separately. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Admission to the hospital was defined as hospitalization for COVID-19–related issues (determined by the admitting or primary hospital teams) that was extracted by chart review for SOTr and from the EHR for the general population. Patients who were admitted for other causes (eg, fall, cellulitis) with incidental asymptomatic COVID-19 as determined by the primary hospital providers were not counted as hospitalized for COVID-19. The first wave of COVID-19 was defined between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2020, and the second wave of COVID-19 beginning October 1, 2020, until the end of the study period at March 31, 2021. Outcomes between the 2 waves of COVID-19 were compared.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Descriptive data were presented as number (percentage) for categorical variables and as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect the means difference for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher exact test was applied to evaluate the difference in incidence of categorical variables among SOTr and general KPSC population with or with COVID-19 and, lastly, among different types of organ transplantation.
Covariates
Individual-level factors included age at diagnosis, gender, race/ethnicity, primary organ transplanted, number of immunosuppressive drugs used, time from transplant, and comorbidities including body mass index (BMI), hypertension, and DM. Subgroup analysis was conducted among SOTr who were hospitalized to evaluate clinical data such as laboratory markers and treatments received.
The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed to detect factors associated with time to COVID-19–related death for infected SOTr. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with confidence intervals (CIs) were presented for each covariate listed above and the Wald P values were calculated. The forest plot was produced to display the result graphically for the multivariate Cox model. All analyses are 2-sided and performed using SAS EG 7.13 (Cary, NC). P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
General Population (Non-SOT) and SOT Populations
Within the KPSC general population, 4.3 million adult patients without SOT and 5126 adult patients who received SOT before December 31, 2020 were identified (Figure 1). The demographic characteristics of the SOTr and the KPSC general population are shown in Table 1. SOTr were older (57.1 ± 14.0 versus 45.7 ± 17.9 y; P < 0.0001) with a lower proportion of females compared with the general population (40.7% versus 51.7%; P < 0.0001). Hispanic/Latino and Whites represented the majority in the general population and SOTr groups.
TABLE 1.
KPSC(N = 4 266 972) | SOT(N = 5126) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, y, mean (SD) | 45.7 (17.9) | 57.1 (14.0) | <0.0001a |
Sex, male, n (%) | 2 060 251 (48.3) | 3025 (59.0) | <0.0001b |
Race, n (%) | <0.0001b | ||
Hispanic | 1 626 505 (38.1) | 2099 (40.9) | |
White | 1 304 380 (30.6) | 1605 (31.3) | |
Asian and Pacific Islander | 472 635 (11.1) | 726 (14.2) | |
Black | 317 224 (7.4) | 619 (12.1) | |
Unknown | 438 777 (10.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
Other | 107 451 (2.5) | 77 (1.5) | |
Comorbidities, n (%) | |||
Hypertension | 1 013 557 (23.8) | 3947 (77.0) | <0.0001b |
Diabetes mellitus | 554 185 (13.0) | 2542 (49.6) | <0.0001b |
COVID-19 | |||
COVID-19 test (≥1 test), n (%) | 1 342 481 (31.5) | 2731 (53.3) | <0.0001b |
COVID-19 positive test rate, % | 23.2 | 21.9 | 0.116 |
COVID-19 incidence, n (%) | 312 011 (7.3) | 600 (11.7) | <0.0001b |
COVID-19 incidence per person-year, () | 7.60 | 10.0 | <0.0001b |
COVID-19 incidence by time period, n (%) | 0.0002b | ||
3/1/20–9/30/20 | 78 362 (25.1) | 111 (18.5) | |
10/1/20–3/31/21 | 233 649 (74.9) | 489 (81.5) | |
All-cause mortality, n (%) | 48 482 (1.1) | 255 (5.0) | <0.0001b |
aKruskal-Wallis P value.
bChi-square P value.
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; KPSC, Kaiser Permanente Southern California; SOT, solid organ transplant; SOTr, SOT recipient.
Between March 1, 2020, and March, 30, 2021, 1 342 481 (31.5%) of general population and 2731 (53.3%) of SOTr underwent COVID-19 testing (P < 0.0001) with positive test rates of 23.2% in the general population and 21.9% in SOTr (P = 0.116). Of the general patient population, 312 011 individuals and 600 SOTr developed COVID-19 with incidences of 7.6 per 100 person-years and 10.0 per 100 person-years (P < 0.0001), respectively (Table 1). In the general population with COVID-19, there was a higher proportion of Hispanics (60.9% versus 38.1%; P < 0.0001) and a lower proportion of Whites (19.3% versus 30.6%; P < 0.0001) compared with those without COVID-19. Similarly, in the SOTr population with COVID-19, there was a higher proportion of Hispanics (58.8% versus 38.6%; P < 0.0001) compared with other racial groups versus uninfected SOTr. Compared with uninfected SOTr, infected SOTr were younger compared with uninfected SOTr (median 57.0 versus 60.0 y; P = 0.0006).
Hospitalization rate was significantly higher for infected SOTr compared with infected general population (39.5% versus 6.0%, P < 0.001; Table 2). Among those hospitalized, 99.4% of non-SOTr were given supplemental oxygen compared with 86.1% of SOTr (P < 0.0001). Remdesivir was given to 66.0% of hospitalized non-SOTr compared with 57.0% of hospitalized SOTr (P = 0.004). ICU hospitalization was higher in SOTr compared with non-SOTr (29.1% versus 15.5%; P < 0.0001). Overall mortality rate of COVID-19 in SOTr was higher compared with the general population (14.7% versus 1.8%; P < 0.0001). Among hospitalized patients, the mortality rate was 34.2% among SOTr compared with 17.3% in the general population (P < 0.0001). Mortality rate in patients admitted to the ICU was also higher among SOTr compared with the general population (88.4% versus 54.9%; P < 0.0001).
TABLE 2.
KPSC(N = 312 011) | SOT(N = 600) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, y, mean (SD) | 57.3 (14.1) | 55.7 (13.4) | <0.0001a |
Sex, male, n (%) | 142 329 (45.6) | 357 (59.5) | <0.0001b |
Race/ethnicity, n (%) | <0.0001b | ||
Asian/Pacific Islander | 23 009 (7.4) | 54 (9.0) | |
Black | 19 727 (6.3) | 67 (11.2) | |
Hispanic | 189 861 (60.9) | 353 (58.8) | |
Other | 6055 (1.9) | 5 (0.8) | |
Unknown | 13 112 (4.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
White | 60 247 (19.3) | 121 (20.2) | |
Hypertension, n (%) | 88 320 (28.3) | 512 (85.3) | <0.0001b |
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 61 292 (19.6) | 342 (57.0) | <0.0001b |
COVID-19 outcomes | |||
Hospitalized for COVID-19 | 18 660 (6.0) | 237 (39.5) | <0.0001b |
Admitted to ICU among hospitalized | 2891 (15.5) | 69 (29.1) | |
COVID-19 mortality, n (%) | 5615 (1.8) | 88 (14.7) | <0.0001b |
COVID-19 mortality among hospitalized | 3223 (17.3) | 81 (34.2) | <0.0001b |
COVID-19 mortality among ICU | 1587 (54.9) | 61 (88.4) | <0.0001b |
aKruskal-Wallis P value.
bChi-square P value.
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; KPSC, Kaiser Permanente Southern California; SOT, solid organ transplant.
SOTr With COVID-19
The baseline characteristics of SOTr with and without COVID-19 are shown in Tables 3 and 4. The SOT cohort with COVID-19 had an average BMI of 29.2 ± 5 kg/m2. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4.9 ± 2.4. SOTr with COVID-19 were more likely to have hypertension (P < 0.0001) and DM (P = 0.0001) compared with those without COVID-19. The majority of SOTr (55.8%) were on ≥3 immunosuppressive medications (including prednisone), whereas only 10.7% were on a single immunosuppressive agent. The most common baseline immunosuppressive agents at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis were tacrolimus (79.0%), prednisone (71.0%), and mycophenolate mofetil (68.8%). At the time of diagnosis with COVID-19, 82.4% were symptomatic, with most common symptoms being cough (47.9%), fever (33.0%), myalgias (23.4%), and dyspnea (21.6%; Table S1, SDC, http://links.lww.com/TP/C584).
TABLE 3.
COVID-19 | |||
---|---|---|---|
N(N = 4526) | Y(N = 600) | P value | |
Age, y, mean (SD) | 57.3 (14.1) | 55.7 (13.4) | 0.0006a |
Sex, male, n (%) | 2668 (58.9) | 357 (59.5) | 0.7963b |
Race/ethnicity, n (%) | <0.0001b | ||
Asian/Pacific Islander | 672 (14.8) | 54 (9.0) | |
Black | 552 (12.2) | 67 (11.2) | |
Hispanic | 1746 (38.6) | 353 (58.8) | |
Other | 72 (1.6) | 5 (0.8) | |
White | 1484 (32.8) | 121 (20.2) | |
Hypertension, n (%) | 3435 (75.9) | 512 (85.3) | <0.0001b |
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 2200 (48.6) | 342 (57.0) | 0.0001b |
aKruskal-Wallis P value.
bChi-square P value.
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; SOTr, solid organ transplant recipient.
TABLE 4.
Primary organ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heart(N = 33) | Kidney(N = 438) | Liver(N = 114) | Lung(N = 15) | Total(N = 600) | P value | |
Age, y, median (IQR) | 57.0 (42.0–71.0) | 56.0 (47.0–64.0) | 62.0 (53.0–67.0) | 61.0 (57.0–68.0) | 57.0 (47.0–66.0) | 0.0035a |
Sex, male, n (%) | 27 (81.8) | 267 (61.0) | 55 (48.2) | 7 (46.7) | 356 (59.3) | 0.0026b |
Race/ethnicity, n (%) | 0.0034c | |||||
Asian | 0 (0.0) | 48 (11.0) | 6 (5.3) | 0 (0.0) | 54 (9.0) | |
Black/African American | 7 (21.2) | 55 (12.6) | 6 (5.3) | 1 (6.7) | 69 (11.5) | |
Hispanic/Latino | 14 (42.4) | 254 (58.0) | 72 (63.2) | 9 (60.0) | 349 (58.2) | |
White | 12 (36.4) | 81 (18.5) | 30 (26.3) | 5 (33.3 | 128 (21.3) | |
Body mass index, mean (SD) | 28.4 (5.6) | 29.3 (5.7) | 29.4 (6.3) | 27.3 (2.6) | 29.2 (5.8) | 0.4806a |
Charlson Comorbidity Index, median (IQR) | 6.0 (2.0–8.0) | 4.0 (3.0–6.0) | 6.0 (3.0–8.0) | 5.0 (3.0–6.0) | 5.0 (3.0–6.0) | 0.0025a |
Hypertension, n (%) | 25 (75.8) | 413 (94.3) | 76 (66.7) | 8 (53.3) | 522 (87.0) | <0.0001b |
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 17 (51.5) | 224 (51.1) | 58 (50.9) | 11 (73.3) | 310 (51.7) | 0.4078b |
Number of Immunosuppressants, median (IQR) | 2.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 2.0 (1.0–2.0) | 3.0 (3.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | <0.0001 |
Immunosuppression type, n (%) | ||||||
Tacrolimus | 24 (72.7) | 333 (76.0) | 103 (90.4) | 14 (93.3) | 474 (79.0) | 0.0032b |
Cyclosporine | 5 (15.2) | 63 (14.4) | 10 (8.8) | 0 (0.0) | 78 (13.0) | 0.1778c |
Mycophenolate | 26 (78.8) | 329 (75.1) | 46 (40.4) | 12 (80.0) | 413 (68.8) | <0.0001b |
Sirolimus | 8 (24.2) | 27 (6.2) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (13.3) | 37 (6.2) | <0.0001c |
Everolimus, n (%) | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.) | 1 (6.7) | 3 (0.5) | 0.0004c |
Prednisone | 10 (30.3) | 369 (84.2) | 32 (28.1%) | 15 (100.0) | 426 (71.0) | <0.0001b |
COVID-19 | ||||||
Incidence | 33 (9.0) | 438 (11.8) | 114 (8.2) | 15 (8.9) | 0.0016 | |
Hospitalized for COVID-19 | 12 (36.4) | 172 (39.3) | 39 (34.2) | 14 (93.3) | 237 (39.5) | <0.0001b |
Admitted to ICU for COVID-19 | 6 (18.2) | 48 (11.0) | 8 (7.0) | 7 (46.7) | 69 (11.5) | <0.0001c |
COVID-19 mortality | 6 (18.2) | 65 (14.8) | 10 (8.8) | 7 (46.7) | 88 (14.7) | 0.0013c |
Among hospitalized | 6 (50.0) | 55 (32.0) | 10 (25.6) | 7 (50.0) | 78 (32.9) | 0.0013 |
Among ICU | 6 (100) | 41 (85.4) | 6 (75.0) | 7 (100) | 60 (87.0) | 0.5553c |
Time from transplant, y, n (%) | 0.1117c | |||||
<1 | 5 (15.2) | 35 (8.0) | 19 (16.7) | 2 (13.3) | 61 (10.2) | |
1–<5 | 9 (27.3) | 134 (30.6) | 35 (30.7) | 8 (53.3) | 186 (31.0) | |
5–<10 | 8 (24.2) | 129 (29.5) | 25 (21.9) | 3 (20.0) | 165 (27.5) | |
≥10 | 11 (33.3) | 140 (32.0) | 35 (30.7) | 2 (13.3) | 188 (31.3) |
aKruskal-Wallis P value.
bChi-Square P value.
cFisher Exact P value.
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; SOTr, solid organ transplant recipient.
Patients with symptomatic COVID-19 were recommended to hold their mycophenolate. Corticosteroids were administered to 30.7% of the infected SOTr cohort (either as new treatment or increased dosage from baseline dose), 22.0% received remdesivir, 6.2% received convalescent plasma, 3.2% received anakinra, and 1.2% received monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19 incidence by transplant era was highest in SOTr transplanted >5 y before infection (13.6%) compared with those transplanted <5 y (9.8%; P = 0.0006; Figure S1, SDC, http://links.lww.com/TP/C584). There were no differences in mortality rate based on time from transplant relative to COVID-19 infection (P = 0.56).
Of the 600 infected SOTr, 110 and 490 were infected during the first and second COVID-19 surges, respectively. Infected SOTr during the first surge were more likely to be hospitalized (51.8% versus 36.7%; P = 0.01), but there were no differences in ICU admission (29.8% versus 28.8%; P = 0.885) or mortality rates (17.3% versus 14.1%; P = 0.39).
Disaggregated SOT Data
The clinical characteristics of SOTr by organ are shown in Table 4. The majority of SOTr were kidney (73%) or liver (19%) transplant recipients. The incidence of COVID-19 infection was highest among kidney (11.8%) and lowest among liver recipients (8.2%) and intermediate among lung (8.9%) and heart transplant recipients (9.0%; P = 0.0016). Lung (61 y) and liver recipients (62 y) were the older, whereas heart recipients (57 y) were the younger (P = 0.004). Hispanic/Latinos was the predominant ethnic group among all organ types with the highest proportion in liver transplant (63.2%) and lowest in heart transplant (42.4%; P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in BMI between organ types (P = 0.48). Majority of the SOTr were on multiple immunosuppressive agents: 55.3% liver, 67.1% kidney, 90.9% heart, and 93.3% lung transplants.
Symptoms were similar among the different SOT groups except for dyspnea that was mostly reported by lung recipients (60%; P = 0.0029). Lung transplant recipients had the highest rate of hospitalization (93.3%; P = 0.0002) and need for ICU care (46.7%;P < 0.0001) compared with other SOTr, compared with liver transplant recipients (7.0%; P < 0.0001). The mortality rates from COVID-19 among SOTr were highest in lung recipients (46.7%) and lowest in liver recipients (8.8%; P = 0.0013). The mortality rate among those hospitalized was highest among heart (50.0%) and lung (50.0%) transplants and lowest in liver transplants (25.6%; P = 0013).
Multivariate Analysis
Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with mortality in the SOTr cohort with COVID-19 as shown in Table 5 and Figure 2. Every 1-y increase in age at diagnosis (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.10; P < 0.0001) was associated with a 7% increased risk of mortality from COVID-19. BMI (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P = 0.047) and having dyspnea on diagnosis (HR, 3.50; 95% CI, 2.27-5. 39; P < 0.0001) were also associated with increased risk of mortality from COVID-19.
TABLE 5.
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Survived (n = 512) | Died (n = 88) | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value |
Age (per 1-y increase) | Median (IQR) = 55.5 (46.0–64.0) | Median (IQR) = 66.0 (58.0–71.0) | 1.06 (1.05-1.09) | <0.0001 | 1.07 (1.05-1.10) | <0.0001 |
Time from transplant (per 1-y increase) | 6.3 (2.7-11.8) | 7.6 (3.4-15.7) | 1.03 (1.00-1.05) | 0.0644 | 1.02 (0.99-1.05) | 0.2038 |
Female gender (reference: male) | 214 (41.8%) | 30 (34.1%) | 0.74 (0.48-1.16) | 0.1895 | 0.56 (0.35-0.90) | 0.016 |
Race/ethnicity (reference: White) | ||||||
White | 108 (21.1%) | 20 (22.7%) | ||||
Asian | 44 (8.6%) | 10 (11.4%) | 1.17 (0.55-2.50) | 0.687 | 0.91 (0.41-2.05) | 0.8266 |
Black/African American | 62 (12.1%) | 7 (8.0%) | 0.63 (0.27-1.48) | 0.2866 | 0.59 (0.24-1.45) | 0.2506 |
Hispanic/Latino | 298 (58.2%) | 51 (58.0%) | 0.92 (0.55-1.54) | 0.7541 | 1.06 (0.61-1.85) | 0.8437 |
Primary organ (reference: kidney) | ||||||
Kidney | 373 (72.9%) | 65 (73.9%) | ||||
Heart | 27 (5.3%) | 6 (6.8%) | 1.25 (0.54-2.88) | 0.6034 | 0.67 (0.27-1.67) | 0.3915 |
Liver | 104 (20.3%) | 10 (11.4%) | 0.57 (0.29-1.11) | 0.1001 | 0.34 (0.16-0.74) | 0.0062 |
Lung | 8 (1.6%) | 7 (8.0%) | 4.06 (1.86-8.87) | 0.0004 | 1.74 (0.68-4.42) | 0.2475 |
Body mass index | Median (IQR) = 28.5 (25.2–32.4) | Median (IQR) = 29.5 (24.8–34.3) | 1.01 (0.97-1.05) | 0.5902 | 1.04 (1.00-1.09) | 0.0471 |
Hypertension | 445 (86.9%) | 77 (87.5%) | 1.06 (0.56-1.99) | 0.8667 | 0.38 (0.18-0.83) | 0.0151 |
Diabetes mellitus | 251 (49.0%) | 59 (67.0%) | 1.99 (1.28-3.11) | 0.0024 | 1.43 (0.89-2.30) | 0.1359 |
Shortness of breath | 88 (17.2%) | 43 (48.9%) | 3.92 (2.58-5.95) | <0.0001 | 3.45 (2.24-5.33) | <0.0001 |
Number of immunosuppressants | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 1.05 (0.81-1.38) | 0.6989 | 1.06 (0.78-1.43) | 0.7087 |
Tacrolimus | 415 (81.1%) | 59 (67.0%) | 0.51 (0.32-0.79) | 0.0027 | ||
Cyclosporine | 60 (11.7%) | 18 (20.5%) | 1.80 (1.07-3.01) | 0.0262 | ||
Mycophenolate | 354 (69.1%) | 59 (67.0%) | 1.11 (0.71-1.72) | 0.6596 | ||
Prednisone | 357 (69.7%) | 69 (78.4%) | 1.52 (0.92-2.53) | 0.104 |
P values calculated by Wald test.
CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range.
Female gender (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.90, P = 0.02) and hypertension (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.86, P = 0.02) were protective against mortality from COVID-19. Liver transplants (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16-0.73; P = 0.006) had lower risk of mortality from COVID-19 compared with kidney transplants. Lung transplant (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.69-4.52; P = 0.23), while having the highest mortality, was not found to be a significant risk factor on multivariate analysis. Ethnicity, DM, number of immunosuppressant medications, and type of immunosuppressants were not found to be significant risk factors for mortality on multivariate analysis. Furthermore, time from transplant at COVID-19 diagnosis was not significantly associated with increased risk of death from COVID-19 (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.05; P = 0.2038).
Subgroup multivariate analysis was performed on patients who were admitted to KPSC hospitals (n = 205; Table S2, SDC, http://links.lww.com/TP/C584). Within this cohort, every 1-y increase in age was associated with an 8% higher risk of mortality from COVID-19 (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12; P < 0.0001). Compared with Whites, Asians (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.58; P = 0.006), and Blacks (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.69; P = 0.01) had lower risk of COVID-19 mortality. Hispanic/Latino race (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.25-1.54; P = 0.31) was not associated with increased risk of mortality compared with other races. In addition, the duration of time to onset of COVID-19 diagnosis and the transplant date were not associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.05; P = 0.20). Patients who received remdesivir trended toward a lower risk of COVID-19 mortality (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26-1.01; P = 0.05). Gender, BMI, DM, and number of immunosuppressive agents were not found to be significant risk factors on subgroup multivariate analysis in hospitalized patients. Using an alternative multivariate model with individual immunosuppressant agents (Table S3, SDC, http://links.lww.com/TP/C584), tacrolimus (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-1.02; P = 0.06) had decreased risk of mortality but did not reach significance.
DISCUSSION
KPSC is the largest healthcare system in southern California, with uniform processes that provide equal access to all members for medical care. We compared the incidences and outcomes of all SOTr and the general population infected with SARS-CoV-2. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study in the United States of disaggregated SOTr who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the initial 2 surges of the pandemic.
Although SOTr were more likely to be tested for COVID-19 compared with the general population, the positive test rates were similar. However, SOTr had a significantly higher incidence of COVID-19 compared with the nontransplant population that has also been reported in Europe and the United States.10,13-15 There were differences in the incidences of COVID-19 among various SOTr, highest among kidney recipients and lowest among liver transplant recipients that was found in studies from Spain,15 Italy,14 and the National COVID Cohort Collaborative.18 In our study, incidence of COVID-19 among liver recipients was comparable with the general population. The reasons for the different incidences of COVID-19 among the different SOTr are not apparent.
In the SOTr, rates of hospitalization were 6-fold higher, ICU admission was almost 2-fold higher, and the mortality was 8-fold higher compared with the general population, which is similar to a smaller study.19 In contrast, a greater proportion of non-SOTr received supplemental oxygen and remdesivir, inferring that they likely had more dyspnea and elevated inflammatory markers compared with SOTr. This may also reflect a lower threshold to admit SOTr because of their immunocompromised status but did not meet national guidelines criteria for remdesivir treatment. As reported by Jering et al,7 SOTr hospitalized for COVID-19 had 2-fold higher mortality compared with the general population. This may be because of the immunosuppressed state and comorbidities, although number and type of immunosuppressive medications used in our cohort were not identified as risk factors for COVID-19–related mortality. However, the number of immunosuppressive medications may not reflect the net state of immunosuppression.
The association of older age with increased mortality from COVID-19 was also confirmed within our cohort. Longer time from transplant to diagnosis of COVID-19 trended toward higher risk of COVID-19 mortality but did not reach statistical significance. Although few studies report associations between time from transplant and mortality, 2 multicenter studies in the United States and the United Kingdom also found that older age rather than time from transplant was associated with mortality.20,21 However, a study in Spain of hospitalized infected SOTr found more favorable outcomes in those closer to their transplant.22 This suggests that other clinical factors such as age and comorbidities may contribute toward COVID-19 mortality in the SOTr cohort.23,24
Among the different SOTr, highest mortality occurred in lung and heart transplants, whereas lowest mortality occurred in liver transplant recipients. This is not surprising as COVID-19 is a respiratory viral illness, and similar to other community respiratory viral infections carry high mortality in lung transplant patient population.25-27 Our findings are similar to other reports in their disaggregated SOTr populations with the highest mortality rates, ranging from 14% to 46% in lung transplant recipients with COVID-19 compared with other SOTr.15,21,25,28-30 Heart recipient mortality was significantly lower than in lung recipients in our cohort, which is similar to other reports.31-33
Kidney transplants had a higher mortality rate compared with liver transplants but lower compared with heart and lung transplants. In a large European database study where 89% of post–kidney transplant recipients were hospitalized for COVID-19, the mortality rate of 21.3% was observed in kidney recipients and 23.6% among those who were hospitalized.34 In another multicenter study of 144 hospitalized kidney recipients with COVID-19 in the United States and Europe, 32% died.35
Our results show that although liver transplants had a higher incidence of COVID-19 and COVID-19–related hospitalizations compared with the general population, the hospitalization and mortality were significantly lower compared with other SOTr. This is similar to 2 reports of matched-cohort liver recipients that reported a wide range of hospitalization rates from 29% to 86.5%, with both reporting a mortality rate of 18%,36,37 whereas others report no difference in mortality between liver recipients and general populations with COVID-19.38,39 Immunosuppressive regimens with kidney, heart, and lung recipients that may include T cell–depleting agents, higher use of corticosteroids, and mycophenolate rendering these 3 transplant groups at higher risk for complications.40
Overall, our cohort had a lower hospitalization rate compared with other studies that report hospitalization rates as high as 82% in SOTr.20 This is likely because of the COVID-19 home monitoring program within KPSC that was implemented in which mild cases of COVID-19 were triaged to reduce hospitalizations.17 This may explain the higher hospital mortality rate in this study because only high-risk patients were hospitalized. The overall mortality rate of 14.7% among all patients (regardless of hospitalization status) is lower compared with the other large-scale studies with multiorgan SOTr reporting mortality rates of 18.7% to 30.6%.14,15,21,41
We also observed higher incidence of COVID-19 infection in Hispanic/Latinos among SOTr and the general population.42-45 Unequal incidence and outcomes in the Hispanic/Latino populations could be attributed to work conditions, housing situation with multigenerational dwellings, healthcare access, coexisting medical conditions, language barriers, and immigration status.43,44,46 However, our SOTr population, regardless of race/ethnicity, has equal access to medical care although the many aforementioned socioeconomic factors may be present. In this study, ethnicity was not identified as a risk factor for COVID-19–related mortality. Our SOTr cohort may have more experience navigating through the healthcare system and have ongoing relationships with their transplant teams with no disparity in access to healthcare.42,47 A centralized group of transplant coordinators provides close follow-up to patients in assisting with routine care and follow-up.
A higher number of patients with COVID-19 were recorded during the second surge, which can be attributed to increased transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 variants and improvement in the testing capabilities. Improved medical management of COVID-19 over time may explain the trend toward better survival observed in our cohort during the second surge. For example, remdesivir was available during the latter portion of the first surge but was used more in the second surge (data not shown). Further analysis of the impact of novel COVID-19 treatments will be investigated in a follow-up study. Coll et al48 observed a higher risk of death during the first wave compared with the second wave among SOTr, but not among those hospitalized. Data on the KPSC population suggest that the epsilon (B.1.427 and B.1.429) and alpha (B.1.1.7) strains were the predominant strains at the end of our study period.49
A major strength of our study is that relevant demographic and clinical data for all SOTr and non-SOT patients within the integrated KPSC healthcare system who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were captured in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Care provided to all COVID-19 patients, including SOTr, was standardized without disparity of access to healthcare, which may have mitigated the variability of clinical outcomes related to therapeutic interventions.50 The comparison between the general non-SOT and SOT population in this cohort was within the same community with similar racial/ethnic distribution that eliminates variance that may be observed in other studies with patients from diverse geographical areas and ethnic distribution.
The limitations of this study include the inherent issues of a retrospective design.51 Vaccination status was not included in this study but will be a focus of investigation in future studies. Because vaccination only became available toward the end of the study period, few patients in this cohort were likely vaccinated. Behavioral data that may be associated with COVID-19 infection were not included in this study.
We observed higher rates of COVID-19 and attributable mortality in the SOTr compared with the non-SOT population. Hispanics/Latinos were disproportionately affected with COVID-19; however, mortality related to COVID-19 was not impacted by race/ethnicity. Infected SOTr were more likely to be hospitalized, require ICU level of care, and have higher COVID-19–related mortality. Incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 were distinct among the different transplant types.
Acknowledgments
Sarah Tartoff and Amber Gardner for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. Southern California Kaiser Permanente transplant clinic staff for patient care and support.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
All authors who meet authorship criteria have been included as authors. All authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the development of the article. Each author certifies that the article has not been published in any other journal. A.S., A.T., and T.-L.F. designed the study, collected and analyzed data, wrote the article, and approved the final version of the article. J.Y. designed the study, collected and analyzed data, and approved the final version of the article. E.D., J.H., and S.J. collected data and approved the final version of the article. J.N., J.H., and R.L. designed the study and approved the final version of the article.
The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.
Supplemental digital content (SDC) is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.transplantjournal.com).
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID data tracker. Available at https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home. Accessed May 19, 2022.
- 2.World Health Organization. WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. Available at https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed May 19, 2022.
- 3.Karim SSA, Karim QA. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: a new chapter in the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;398:2126–2128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brodin P. Immune determinants of COVID-19 disease presentation and severity. Nat Med. 2021;27:28–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.People with certain medical conditions. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html. Accessed February 13, 2022.
- 6.Azzi Y, Bartash R, Scalea J, et al. COVID-19 and solid organ transplantation: a review article. Transplantation. 2021;105:37–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jering KS, McGrath MM, Mc Causland FR, et al. Excess mortality in solid organ transplant recipients hospitalized with COVID-19: a large-scale comparison of SOT recipients hospitalized with or without COVID-19. Clin Transplant. 2022;36:e14492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fung M, Chiu CY, DeVoe C, et al. Clinical outcomes and serologic response in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19: a case series from the United States. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:3225–3233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fernández-Ruiz M, Andrés A, Loinaz C, et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a single-center case series from Spain. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:1849–1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Felldin M, Søfteland JM, Magnusson J, et al. Initial report from a Swedish high-volume transplant center after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Transplantation. 2021;105:108–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Raja MA, Mendoza MA, Villavicencio A, et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021;35:100588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Avery RK, Chiang TP, Marr KA, et al. Inpatient COVID-19 outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients compared to non-solid organ transplant patients: a retrospective cohort. Am J Transplant. 2021;21:2498–2508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pereira MR, Mohan S, Cohen DJ, et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: initial report from the US epicenter. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:1800–1808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Trapani S, Masiero L, Puoti F, et al. ; Italian Network of Regional Transplant Coordinating Centers Collaborating group; Italian Surveillance System of Covid-19, Italian Society for Organ Transplantation (SITO), The Italian Board of Experts in Liver Transplantation (I-BELT) Study Group, Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN), SIN-SITO Study Group. Incidence and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection on solid organ transplantation recipients: a nationwide population-based study. Am J Transplant. 2021;21:2509–2521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Coll E, Fernández-Ruiz M, Sánchez-Álvarez JE, et al. ; Spanish Group for the Study of COVID-19 in Transplant Recipients. COVID-19 in transplant recipients: the Spanish experience. Am J Transplant. 2021;21:1825–1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koebnick C, Langer-Gould AM, Gould MK, et al. Sociodemographic characteristics of members of a large, integrated health care system: comparison with US Census Bureau data. Perm J. 2012;16:37–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huynh DN, Millan A, Quijada E, et al. Description and early results of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California COVID-19 Home Monitoring Program. Perm J. 2021;25:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vinson AJ, Agarwal G, Dai R, et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplantation: results of the national COVID cohort collaborative. Transplant Direct. 2021;7:e775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ranabothu S, Kanduri SR, Nalleballe K, et al. Outcomes of COVID-19 in solid organ transplants. Cureus. 2020;12:10–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Webb GJ, Marjot T, Cook JA, et al. Outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in liver transplant recipients: an international registry study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:1008–1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kates OS, Haydel BM, Florman SS, et al. ; UW COVID-19 SOT Study Team. Coronavirus disease 2019 in solid organ transplant: a multicenter cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:e4090–e4099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Salto-Alejandre S, Jiménez-Jorge S, Sabé N, et al. Risk factors for unfavorable outcome and impact of early post-transplant infection in solid organ recipients with COVID-19: a prospective multicenter cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cristelli MP, Viana LA, Dantas MTC, et al. The full spectrum of COVID-19 development and recovery among kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2021;105:1433–1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hadi YB, Naqvi SFZ, Kupec JT, et al. Outcomes of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a propensity-matched analysis of a large research network. Transplantation. 2021;105:1365–1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Saez‐Giménez B, Berastegui C, Barrecheguren M, et al. COVID‐19 in lung transplant recipients: a multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2021;21:1816–1824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Myers CN, Scott JH, Criner GJ, et al. ; Temple University COVID-19 Research Group. COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2020;22:e13364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Permpalung N, Bazemore K, Chiang TP, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on lung allograft and clinical outcomes in lung transplant recipients: a case-control study. Transplantation. 2021;105:2072–2079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Messika J, Eloy P, Roux A, et al. ; French Group of Lung Transplantation. COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2021;105:177–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kamp JC, Hinrichs JB, Fuge J, et al. COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients—risk prediction and outcomes. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0257807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Heldman MR, Kates OS, Safa K, et al. ; UW COVID-19 SOT Study Team. COVID-19 in hospitalized lung and non-lung solid organ transplant recipients: a comparative analysis from a multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2021;21:2774–2784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Diaz‐Arocutipa C, Carvallo‐Castañeda D, Luis‐Ybañez O, et al. COVID‐19 in heart transplant recipients during February–August 2020: a systematic review. Clin Transplant. 2021;35:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rivinius R, Kaya Z, Schramm R, et al. COVID-19 among heart transplant recipients in Germany: a multicenter survey. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109:1531–1539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Latif F, Farr MA, Clerkin KJ, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of recipients of heart transplant with coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:1165–1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hilbrands LB, Duivenvoorden R, Vart P, et al. ; ERACODA Collaborators. COVID-19-related mortality in kidney transplant and dialysis patients: results of the ERACODA collaboration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35:1973–1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cravedi P, Mothi SS, Azzi Y, et al. COVID-19 and kidney transplantation: results from the TANGO International Transplant Consortium. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:3140–3148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lee BT, Perumalswami PV, Im GY, et al. ; COBE Study Group. COVID-19 in liver transplant recipients: an initial experience from the US epicenter. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:1176–1178.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Colmenero J, Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Salcedo M, et al. Epidemiological pattern, incidence, and outcomes of COVID-19 in liver transplant patients. J Hepatol. 2021;74:148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mansoor E, Perez A, Abou-Saleh M, et al. Clinical characteristics, hospitalization, and mortality rates of coronavirus disease 2019 among liver transplant patients in the United States: a multicenter research network study. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:459–462.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rinaldi M, Bartoletti M, Bussini L, et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: no difference in survival compared to general population. Transpl Infect Dis. 2021;23:e13421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Neurath MF. COVID-19: biologic and immunosuppressive therapy in gastroenterology and hepatology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18:705–715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Azzi Y, Parides M, Alani O, et al. COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients at the epicenter of pandemics. Kidney Int. 2020;98:1559–1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nau C, Bruxvoort K, Navarro RA, et al. COVID-19 inequities across multiple racial and ethnic groups: results from an integrated health care organization. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:1183–1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Macias Gil R, Marcelin JR, Zuniga-Blanco B, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: disparate health impact on the Hispanic/Latinx population in the United States. J Infect Dis. 2020;222:1592–1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Azar KMJ, Shen Z, Romanelli RJ, et al. Disparities in outcomes among COVID-19 patients in a large health care system in California. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39:1253–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nuño M, García Y, Rajasekar G, et al. COVID-19 hospitalizations in five California hospitals: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Double Jeopardy: COVID-19 and Behavioral Health Disparities for Black and Latino Communities in the U.S. 2020. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/covid19-behavioral-health-disparities-black-latino-communities.pdf. Accessed February 20, 2022.
- 47.Tartof SY, Qian L, Hong V, et al. Obesity and mortality among patients diagnosed with COVID-19: results from an integrated health care organization. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:773–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Coll E, Fernández-Ruiz M, Padilla M, et al. ; Spanish Group for the Study of COVID-19 in Transplant Recipients. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients in Spain throughout 2020: catching the wave? Transplantation. 2021;105:2146–2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Malden DE, Bruxvoort KJ, Tseng HF, et al. Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 variants in a large integrated health care system—California, March-July 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:1415–1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.La Londe R, LiBetti G, Weisshaar D, et al. High-quality outcomes for transplant patients: the national transplant services quality program and collaboration with transplant centers. Permanente J. 2020;24:20.046. 15–16. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.