Figure 3.

The influence of 30 sessions of active rTMS compared to sham treatment on clinical assessments and electrophysiological evaluation. (a) CRS-R scores poststimulation in both groups were significantly increased compared to that in baseline; (b) GCS scores poststimulation in both groups were significantly increased compared to that in baseline; (c) N20 latencies following active rTMS were significantly shorter compared to that in baseline, while no significant decrease was produced in the sham group compared with baseline; (d) N20-P25 amplitudes in both groups were significantly higher compared to that in baseline; (e) BAEP grades in both groups were significantly improved compared to that in the baseline. ^∗p < 0.05. Abbreviations: CRS-R: Coma Recovery Scale-Revised; GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale.