Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 5;2(4):100132. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100132

Table 2.

Facility-level barriers to implant removal, by country and facility type

Variable Burkina Faso (n=203)
Democratic Republic of Congo (n=157) Ethiopia (n=494) Kenya (n=829) Nigeria (n=117) Uganda (n=231)
Hospitals Nonhospitals Hospitals Nonhospitals Hospitals Nonhospitals Hospitals Nonhospitals Hospitals Nonhospitals Hospitals Nonhospitals
n 21 182 45 112 140 354 98 731 39 78 45 186
Report they lack at least some of the supplies necessary to remove an implanta 24% 16% 29% 27% 21% 53% 6% 24% 18% 19% 16% 22%
Report they do not have a provider trained to remove implants 0% 3% 0% 5% 2% 23% 0% 1% 3% 1% 0% 0%
Report they could not remove a deeply placed implant onsite 19% 16% 7% 16% 4% 57% 19% 36% 10% 36% 0% 28%
Report at least 1 of the above barriers 38% 29% 31% 35% 22% 72% 24% 50% 23% 46% 16% 40%

aNecessary supplies include antiseptic, sterile gauze, anesthetic, scalpel blade, forceps, and clean gloves. In Ethiopia, data on clean gloves were missing, so clean gloves were excluded from the list of necessary supplies.

Senderowicz. Facility readiness to remove contraceptive implants. Am J Obstet Gynecol Glob Rep 2022.