Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 29;38(11):2413–2424. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02649-1

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the study population

All studies, n = 300
Gender, n 115 females, 185 males
Age, years 50, (28)
BSA, m2 1.89 ± 0.25
CMR findings
 No pathology, n 100
 Dilated cardiomyopathy, n 50
 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, n 50
 Ischaemic heart disease, n 50
 Valvular or congenital disease, n 50
Image quality
 Score 0 (excellent), n 39
 Score 1 (good), n 213
 Score 2 (adequate), n 48
AI contours score
 Good, n 30
 Adequate, n 220
 Suboptimal, n 50
CMR studies with normal findings, n = 100
 Gender, n 53 females, 47 males
 Age, years 43, (27)
 BSA, m2 1.82 ± 0.18
CMR indication
 Cardiomyopathy screen, n 64
 Ischaemia assessment, n 13
 Suspected myocarditis, n 11
 Arrhythmia, n 9
 Aorta assessment, n 3
Image quality
 Score 0 (excellent), n 31
 Score 1 (good), n 55
 Score 2 (adequate), n 14
AI contours score
 Good, n 24
 Adequate, n 67
 Suboptimal, n 9
Dilated cardiomyopathy studies, n = 50
 Gender, n 8 females, 42 males
 Age, years 50, (38)
 BSA, m2 2.05, (0.23)
Image quality
 Score 0 (excellent), n None
 Score 1 (good), n 37
 Score 2 (adequate), n 13
AI contours score
 Good, n 1
 Adequate, n 36
 Suboptimal, n 13
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy studies, n = 50
 Gender, n 14 females, 36 males
 Age, years 60, (22)
 BSA, m2 1.87 ± 0.20
Image quality
 Score 0 (excellent), n None
 Score 1 (good), n 46
 Score 2 (adequate), n 4
AI contours score
 Good, n 3
 Adequate, n 45
 Suboptimal, n 2
Ischaemic heart disease cases, n = 50
 Gender, n 15 females, 35 males
 Age, years 66.7 ± 11.3
BSA, m2 1.95 ± 0.26
Image quality
 Score 0 (excellent), n 2
 Score 1 (good), n 39
 Score 2 (adequate), n 9
AI contours score
 Good, n None
 Adequate, n 41
 Suboptimal, n 9
Valvular heart disease or congenital cases, n = 50
 Gender, n 25 females, 25 males
 Age, years 38, (23)
 BSA, m2 1.83 ± 0.24
CMR indication
 Aortic valve disease, n 11
 Mitral valve disease, n 3
 Pulmonary valve disease, n 3
 Shunt lesions, n 6
 Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot, n 14
 TGA after arterial switch, n 1
 Coarctation of aorta, n 12
Image quality
 Score 0 (excellent), n 6
 Score 1 (good), n 36
 Score 2 (adequate), n 8
AI contours score
 Good, n 2
 Adequate, n 31
 Suboptimal, n 17

Normal distribution was tested with Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed parameters presented as mean ± SD and parameters not meeting normality presented as median, (interquartile range)

AI artificial intelligence; BSA body surface area; CMR cardiovascular magnetic resonance; TGA transposition of great arteries