Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 25;22:1219. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10192-4

Table 2.

Incidences and grades of cetuximab-induced hypersensitivity infusion reactions (CI-IRs) in each area with different Lyme disease risks

Areas Estimated mean annual regional incidence rates of Lyme diseasea(per 100 000 inhabitants) Incidences of CI-IRs
Grade 1, N (%) Grade 2, N (%) Grade 3, N (%) Grade 4, N (%) Grade 5, N (%) Low gradeb,
N (%)
Severe gradec,
N (%)
Any grades, N (%)

High-risk area

Limoges (N = 266)

> 150 3 (1.1) 10 (3.8) 14 (5.3) 8 (3.0) 0 13 (4.9) 22 (8.3) 35 (13.2)

Medium-risk area

Nancy (N = 467)

50–100 7 (1.5) 10 (2.1) 14 (3.0) 2 (0.4) 0 17 (3.6) 16 (3.4) 33 (7.1)

Low-risk area

Reims (N = 407)

20–50 4 (1.0) 7 (1.7) 14 (3.4) 8 (2.0) 0 11 (2.7) 22 (5.4) 33 (8.1)

Very-low-risk area

Amiens

(N = 252)

5–20 4 (1.6) 4 (1.6) 5 (2.0) 3 (1.2) 0 8 (3.2) 8 (3.2) 16 (6.4)
Overall study population (N = 1392) 18 (1.3) 31 (2.2) 47 (3.4) 21 (1.5) 0 49 (3.5) 68 (4.9) 117 (8.4)

CI-IRs, cetuximab induced hypersensitivity infusion reactions; N, number of patients

a from Septfons A, et al. Epidemiology of Lyme borreliosis through two surveillance systems: the national Sentinelles GP network and the national hospital discharge database, France, 2005 to 2016. Eurosurveillance. 2019;24(11). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.11.1800134 [41]. b defined as grade 1 or grade 2 infusion reactions. c defined as grade 3 or grade 4 infusion reactions