Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 15;19(4):1717–1730. doi: 10.1007/s13178-022-00748-1

Table 2.

Associations between lifetime healthcare mistreatment and healthcare avoidance due to anticipated mistreatment in transfeminine, transmasculine, and gender-expansive groups

Models Total sample Gender expansive Transfeminine Transmasculine
Model 1 OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p
     Experienced lifetime healthcare discrimination 4.47 3.61, 5.63 p < 0.001 4.71 3.57, 6.20 p < 0.001 10.32 4.72, 22.59 p < 0.001 3.90 2.50, 6.13 p < 0.001
Model 2
     Experienced lifetime healthcare discrimination (direct effect) 3.82 2.80, 5.23 p < .001 4.52 2.96, 6.92 p < 0.001 4.03 1.35, 12.04 p = 0.013 3.21 1.75, 5.88 p < 0.001
     State-level healthcare policy protections (direct effect) 0.85 0.65, 1.11 p = 0.223 0.96 0.69, 1.34 p = 0.807 0.45 0.15, 1.35 p = 0.156 0.57 0.31, 1.06 p = 0.074
     Experienced lifetime healthcare discrimination x state-level healthcare policy protections 1.33 0.88, 2.02 p = 0.177 1.07 0.62, 1.86 p = 0.801 5.02 1.11, 22.76 p = 0.037 1.55 0.66, 3.65 p = 0.313

Bolded values indicate significance at the < 0.0045 level

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Covariates in analyses included age, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, household income, and education level