Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 13;52(13):2575–2583. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05399-3

Table 2.

Relationship between contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters and Lee grade

Lee II Lee III Lee IV P-value
No. of patients 8 9 8
RT (s) 21.9 ± 2.3a 22.7 ± 1.3 27.7 ± 4.3b 0.001
TTP (s) 22.4 ± 2.4a 23.3 ± 1.6 29.4 ± 5.1b 0.001
mTT (s) 410.9 ± 172.6 322.0 ± 122.5 260.5 ± 169.7 0.11
QOF (%) 87.2 ± 4.7 88.1 ± 4.3 85.1 ± 4.9 0.25

mTT mean transit time, QOF quality of fit, RT rise time, s seconds, TTP time to peak

a P < 0.05 (significant, bold), Lee II compared to the Lee IV

b P < 0.05 (significant, bold), Lee III compared to the Lee IV