Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 6;74(Suppl 2):2104–2110. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02005-6

Table 3.

Comparative analysis of treatment outcome on laryngoscopic findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux

Reflux finding score (RFS) Group A Group B Significance of difference between Group A & B post treatment mean (P value)
Pre treatment mean ± SD 8 weeks post treatment mean ± SD Significance of difference between pre and post treatment mean (P value) Pre treatment mean ± SD 8 weeks post treatment mean ± SD Significance of difference between pre and post treatment mean (P value)
Pseudosulcus vocalis
Ventricular obliteration 1.08 ± 1.08 0.92 ± 1.01 0.4460 1.04 ± 0.92 0.16 ± 0.54  < 0.0001b  < 0.0001b
Erythema/hyperemia 3.28 ± 1.05 3.24 ± 1.06 0.8500 3.04 ± 1.22 0.48 ± 0.86  < 0.0001b  < 0.0001b
Vocal fold oedema 0.78 ± 0.93 0.54 ± 0.73 0.1544 0.884 ± 0.71 0.16 ± 0.37  < 0.0001b 0.0014b
Diffuse laryngeal oedema 1.56 ± 1.07 1.34 ± 1.02 0.2952 1.76 ± 0.71 0.54 ± 0.57  < 0.0001b  < 0.0001b
Posterior commissure hypertrophy 2.40 ± 0.63 2.26 ± 0.72 0.3033 2.42 ± 0.61 1.48 ± 0.73  < 0.0001b  < 0.0001b
Granuloma/granulation
Thick endolaryngeal mucus 0.40 ± 0.80 0.36 ± 0.77 0.7995 0.60 ± 0.92 0.20 ± 0.61 0.0119a 0.2522

aModerately significant (P value:0.01 < P < 0.05)

bStrongly significant (P value: P < 0.01)