Skip to main content
. 1999 Dec;67(12):6234–6241. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.12.6234-6241.1999

TABLE 2.

Comparison of immune responses to ETEC induced by natural disease and vaccination of adult Bangladeshi subjects

Immune parameter Mediana (25th–75th percentile) (n) for:
Fold increaseb
Statistical significancec
Patients
Vacinees, day 21 Day 3 Day 9 Day 3 Day 9
Day 3 Day 9
CFA-specific
 Gut ASCd 3,300 (400–11,000) (n = 8) 2,500 (600–4,000)e (n = 4) 1,200 (400–1,600) (n = 13) 2.8 2.1 NS NS
 Blood ASCd 1,800 (230–4,800) (n = 10) 380 (320–430) (n = 6) 38 (16–99) (n = 27) 48 10 P = 0.0006 P = 0.028
 Fecal Abf 0.92 (0.28–2.5) (n = 6) 18 (8–160) (n = 5) 3.4 (1.0–6.6) (n = 18) (3.4) 5.2 NS P = 0.005
CTB-specific
 Gut ASC 5,400 (750–24,000) (n = 12) 5,100 (3,300–9,200) (n = 9) 1,400 (0–7,000) (n = 13) 3.7 3.5 NS NS
 Blood ASC 110 (50–180) (n = 13) 150 (80–280) (n = 10) 420 (190–660) (n = 27) (3.7) (2.8) P = 0.028 NS
 Fecal Ab 7.2 (2.5–20) (n = 8) 33 (9–600) (n = 8) 35 (11–66) (n = 18) (5) 1 NS NS
a

Values are numbers of ASC or titers of antibody (Ab). 

b

How many times higher the immune response was in patients than in vaccinees. Parentheses indicate that the immune response was higher in vaccinees. 

c

Calculated by the Mann-Whitney test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. NS, not significant. 

d

CFA/I. 

e

The 25th to 75th percentile could not be calculated due to the paucity of patients; instead, the lowest and highest values are given. 

f

CS5.