Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 11;2020(8):CD008016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008016.pub3

Fluphenazine depot 1981.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomisation: randomly assigned.
Allocation: procedure not described.
Blinding: double‐blind, placebo injection.
Duration: 6 weeks.
Design: parallel.
Location:  single‐centre.
Setting: outpatient.
Participants Diagnosis: chronic schizophrenic outpatients (DSM‐III).
N = 31.
Gender: n.i..
Age: 37 years.
History: duration stable‐ 2 years on fluphenazine decanoate 3 weekly, duration ill‐ n.i., number of previous hospitalisations‐ n.i., age at onset‐ 24 years, severity of illness‐ mean GAS (Global Assessment Scale Endicott 1976 by Spitzer & Endicott 1976), baseline antipsychotic dose‐ 39.3 mg/3 weekly fluphenazine decanoate.
Interventions 1. Drug: fluphenazine decanoate‐ Fixed doses. Allowed dose range: n.i. ‐ same dose as before. Mean dose: n.i.. N = 14.
2. Placebo: duration of taper: 0 days, but all on depot. N = 17.
Rescue medication: n.i..
Outcomes Examined
Relapse: clinical judgement.
Leaving the study early.
Service use: number of participants hospitalised.
Social functioning: Global Assessment Scale (GAS).
Unable to use/Not included
Community adjustment: Weissman Social Adjustment scale (no usable data)
Depression: SADS (no mean, no SD/no prespecified outcome of interest).
Adverse effects: tardive diskinesia (no usable data).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Random, no further details.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Procedure not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, placebo injection.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, placebo injection.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, placebo injection.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk 3 out of 30 participants (10%) left the study early which is an acceptable rate, irrespective of the statistical analysis (completer analysis).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence for selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No evidence for other bias.