Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 11;2020(8):CD008016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008016.pub3

Various drugs 1960.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomisation: random, no further details.
Allocation: procedure not described.
Blinding: double‐blind, unidentifiable capsules.
Duration: 6 months.
Design: parallel.
Location: single‐centre.
Setting: outpatient.
Participants Diagnosis: chronic psychotic patients (mainly schizophrenia, clinical diagnosis).
N = 144.
Gender: n.i..
Age: n.i..
History: duration stable‐ "observed on the same drugs for 4.5 months”, duration ill‐ n.i., number of previous hospitalisations‐ n.i., age at onset‐ n.i., severity of illness‐ n.i., baseline antipsychotic dose‐ n.i..
Interventions 1. Drug: continuation of antipsychotic taken before the study ‐ Fixed/flexible dose: unclear. Allowed dose range: unclear. Mean dose: n.i.. N = 46.
2. Placebo: duration of taper: "4 weeks to five months, usually 2 months”. N = 98.
Rescue medication: n.i..
Outcomes Examined
Relapse: clinical diagnosis.
Unable to use/Not included
Social adjustment: (not reported for the randomised participants).
Rehospitalisation (unclear numbers).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Random, no further details.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Procedure not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, unidentifiable capsules.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, unidentifiable capsules.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, unidentifiable capsules.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Whether participants left the study early is unclear.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence for selective reporting.
Other bias High risk In case of relapse the blind was broken.