Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 11;2020(8):CD008016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008016.pub3

Various drugs 1989.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomisation: assumed, because study was double‐blind and because the first study phase was randomised (no further details).
Allocation: procedure not described.
Blinding: double‐blind, no further details.
Duration: 12 months.
Design: parallel.
Location:  single‐centre.
Setting: outpatient.
Participants Diagnosis: first episode schizophrenia (Present State Examination, Feighner criteria and Research Diagnostic Criteria).
N = 15.
Gender: n.i.
Age: n.i.
History: duration stable‐ 1 year, duration ill‐ n.i., number of previous hospitalisations‐ n.i., age at onset‐ n.i., severity of illness‐ n.i., baseline antipsychotic dose‐ n.i..
Interventions 1. Drug: pimozide once weekly or IM flupenthixol. Flexible doses. Allowed dose range: n.i.. Mean dose: n.i.. N = 8.
2. Placebo: duration of taper: 0 days N = 7.
Rescue medication: antiparkinson medication.
Outcomes Examined
Relapse: re‐admission.
Rehospitalisation.
Unable to use/Not included
Leaving the study early (no data).
Global state ‐ number of participants in remission (no data for withdrawal study).
Social adjustment (no data for withdrawal study).
Cognition (no data for withdrawal study / no predefined outcome of interest).
Adverse effects: parkinsonism, tardive dyskinesia (no data for withdrawal study).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation assumed.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Procedure not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, no further details.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, no further details.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, no further details.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk It is unclear whether there were missing data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence for selective reporting.
Other bias Unclear risk Not entirely clear.