Table 2.

Regression analysis of the relationship between professional identification and career adaptability.

Regression equation		Fitting index			Significance
Result variable	Predictor variable	R	R 2	F	β	t
Career adaptability	Gender	0.602	0.362	52.863	0.275	1.164
	Age				−0.047	−1.628
	Degree level				0.146	1.203
	Professional identification				0.596	14.377***
Teacher efficacy	Gender	0.433	0.188	21.500***	−0.179	−0.673
	Age				−0.035	−1.090
	Degree level				0.115	0.835
	Professional identification				0.431	9.202***
Self-leadership	Gender	0.640	0.409	51.407***	−0.202	−0.891
	Age				−0.027	−0.986
	Degree level				−0.043	−0.370
	Professional identification				0.483	10.897***
	Teacher efficacy				0.254	5.730***
Career adaptability	Gender	0.754	0.568	81.132***	0.424	2.176*
	Age				−0.023	−0.983
	Degree level				0.134	1.339
	Professional identification				0.238	5.477***
	Teacher efficacy				0.164	4.139***
	Self-leadership				0.485	10.912***

All variables in the model have been standardized. The control variables are gender, age and degree level, the independent variable is professional identification, and the outcome variable is career adaptability.

^*p < 0.05; ^***p < 0.001.