Table 1.
Study characteristics
Study | Type | Objective | Participants and demographics | Methodologies: theory/framework, sampling, intervention/exposure, evaluation and statistical methods | Key findings and outcomes |
Appleby38; the UK | MMS | Nurses’ and HCAs’ intentions to implement a ‘care round checklist’ | N=270 270 nurses and HCAs; 40% HCAs, approx. 110 Response rate 38% |
Theory: the theory of planned behavior; Scale development: semistructured qualitative interview; Scoring: Likert scale; Statistical method: exploratory factor analysis; correlations |
|
Campbell et al39; the USA | O | Relational quality of RN and NA, and manager’s influence on the quality and patient safety | N=1152 889 RNs and 263 NAs; from 53 full-time inpatient units |
Database: hospital survey on patient safety culture survey results; Evaluation: a seven-item leader–member exchange questionnaire to evaluate relational quality, and a four-dimension manager to influence composite measures derived from AHRQ survey composites; Statistical method: paired t-test |
Manager influence had a strong relationship with overall perceptions of safety regardless of the relational quality perceptions of RNs and NAs |
Campbell et al40; the USA | ES | Interventions for teamwork, delegation and communication between RNs and NAs | Seven studies on NAs, RNs and LPNs | Methodology: integrative review; Searching: PRISMA; Critical appraisal: Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and SQUIRE V.2.0 |
|
Dutton and Kozachik41; the USA | PPT | The utilisation, satisfaction and effect of a web-based stress management programme (BREATHE) | N=31 31 nursing staff, of which 6 CNAs. F:M 29:2 Majority age 30–49, ethnicity black, diploma baccalaureate |
Theory: the translation framework Knowledge to Action for developing the project; Intervention: web-based survey and 2-month web-based intervention using the programme; Evaluation: Nurse Stress Scale for measuring stress; Statistical method: paired t-test |
|
Dykes et al42; the USA | MMS | Developing and testing the Self Efficacy for Preventing Falls—Nurse/Assistant (SEPFN/SEPFA) scales | N=83 27 CNAs in phase I and III, 269 CNAs in the survey, 83 were included in the data analysis |
Theory: classical measurement theory; Scale development: focus groups for phase I and III, and reliability test in phase IV; Scale scoring: six-point Likert system; Sampling: snowball; Statistical method: independent and paired t-test, and Cronbach’s α for consistency reliability |
SEPFN/SEPFA scales achieved psychometric adequacy and were recommended to measure self-efficacy beliefs in preventing falls |
Feng et al43; China | O | Working conditions of NAs employed by hospital or company | N=538 538 NAs in 10 hospitals |
Evaluation: questionnaire on demographics, vocational identity and stability, and working satisfaction Statistical method: chi-square test |
NAs employed by hospital only had significant differences on age (younger), education background, vocational stability and identity, and working satisfaction (all better) between those employed by company |
Friesen and Andersen44; Canada | ES | Evidence on collaborative or intradisciplinary palliative education strategies for HCAs | 16 studies on HCAs, from the UK, the USA, Canada and Australia | Qualitative metasummary | Six implications for implementing a collaborative palliative educational workshop: previewing teaching process with HCAs a priori; the content should be practical; all HCAs should attend; ensuring the benefits were transferrable to care settings; ensuring HCAs were able to use newly acquired skills; and choosing education strategies that HCAs favoured |
Gao and Zhao45; China | PPT | Effectiveness of dual management model (by hospital and company) on NAWs | N=1344 patients | Intervention: NAs from companies were dual managed by hospital (hospital—nursing department—care unit) and company; Evaluation: a questionnaire on competency, patient satisfaction, complaints, execution of duties, and compliance with hospital regulations; Statistical method: Cronbach’s α and Spearman correlation for reliability and validity, and chi-square test for results |
|
Geoffrion et al46; Canada | ES | The effectiveness of education and training methods to prevent workplace aggression | N=1688 9 studies with 1688 HCWs |
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions |
|
Haigh and Garside47; the UK | MMS | Impact of the care certificate on the HCAs | N=11 11 HCAs |
Evaluation: a mixed methods 18-item questionnaire on feedback of the care certificate; Statistical method: only descriptive |
|
Haraldsson et al.48; Sweden | O | To compare a questionnaire with technical measurements (electromyography) on assessment of workload of CNAs | N=16 16 CNAs, F:M 15:1 Median (min–max): weight 62 (56–92) kg, height 164 (158–181) cm, working time 475 (457–504) min, break time 66.5 (50–95) min |
Evaluation: the Structured Multidisciplinary Evaluation Tool (SMET); surface electromyography to assess workload; Statistical method: correlation matrix |
|
Kennerly et al49; the USA | O | Psychometric properties of the Nursing Culture Assessment Tool | N=340 340 RNs, LPNs and CNAs CNA response rate: 10% F:M 318:22 38.8% working in acute care settings Working experience median 15.23 years |
Theory: the polytomous universal model; Sampling: convenience sampling via mail; Evaluation: the Nursing Culture Assessment Model; Statistical method: Cronbach’s α for consistency reliability, exploratory factor analyses for validity; logistic regression for differential item functioning |
|
Lee et al50; the USA | MMS | An education programme on safe patient handling and mobility | N=236 224 nursing staff in pilot education, and 12 in house-wide education. 281 course trainers and 98 coaches were trained for the programme |
Intervention: 3-phase development of the education programme: pilot, house-wide and ongoing education; Evaluation: descriptive and qualitative evaluation |
A 4–8-hour education programme aimed at safe transfer, patient mobility and prevention of nursing staff’s injury was developed including prework, application, trainer and peer coach courses, through online learning, demonstration, skill evaluation and coaching |
Liu et al.51; China | PPT | Effectiveness of a comprehensive administration approach of NAWs on patient and RN’s satisfaction | N=150 150 NAWs, (mean±SD) age 48.72±4.56 working experience 3.53±0.97 years |
Intervention: a management model, where NAWs were managed by the nursing department, head nurses and RNs triply, and a refined prejob, enrolment and continuing education system; Evaluation: a questionnaire on attitude, ward environment and care quality; Statistical method: Cronbach’s α for reliability, and t-test for outcomes |
The novel management model significantly improved patient and RN’s satisfaction on NAWs, and reduced unreasonable charge events of NAWs |
Ma et al52; China | PPT | Effectiveness of failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method in NAW administration | N=50 50 NAWs in a ward |
Intervention: improving of job responsibilities, prework and continuing education, and quality control according to the FMEA scoring; Evaluation: FMEA scoring on severity, occurrence and detection; Statistical method: independent t-test |
The FMEA method ran well in NAW administration, with the intervention according to FMEA significantly improving severity, occurrence and detection scores |
McKenzie et al53; the UK | Qual | Effect of a simulation-based education programme on HCAs | N=6 6 HCAs having attended the Crisis Avoidance and Resource Management |
Intervention: the Crisis Avoidance and Resource Management programme; Qualitative evaluation: focus groups; semistructured interview |
|
Monteiro et al54; Brazil | Q | Work capacity of NAs | N=651 651 participants, of which 241 NAs F:M 83:17 Mean age 39.9 Response rate 89.4% |
Evaluation: the Work Ability Index; Statistical method: univariate and multiple logistic regression |
Age, body mass index, and duration of the work were associated with work ability (capacity) |
Nie et al.55; China | PT | Effectiveness of a group collaborative training model for NAs | N=60 60 NAs, F:M 78:21 (Mean±SD) age 41.5±9.35 |
Intervention: lecture, practical training and simulation study intragroups, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation, living care and clinical care; Evaluation: practical test, patient and clinical professional’s satisfaction of NA working, and NA’s approval rate of the education programme |
|
Nørgaard et al56; Denmark | PPT | Development and effectiveness of a training programme for communication skills | N=148 181 participants, of which 30 NAs, and 148 completed entire process F:M 86:14 |
Theory and model: the Calgary–Cambridge Observation Guide; the self-efficacy theory; Intervention: a 3-day training programme; Qualitative evaluation: focus group interview for training contents and questionnaire; Quantitative evaluation: a 19-item self-efficacy questionnaire; Statistical method: paired t-test and linear regression |
|
Pfeifer et al57 the USA | MMS | Effect of an education programme on dementia patients’ care | N=428 428 CNAs |
Intervention: a 1-hour dementia education programme; Qualitative method: two open-ended questions; Quantitative method: a three-item Likert-type questionnaire |
|
Prestia and Dyess58; the USA | PPT | Effect of a care partner programme on relationships between CNAs and patients | All CNAs in a 333-bed hospital | Theory: caring theory Intervention: a 1-day care partner programme, including discussion, expectations, FISH philosophy and video, the AIDET tool (acknowledge, introduce, duration, explain and thank) and interactions; Evaluation: a patient satisfaction score from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System survey |
The care partner programme significantly increased hospitals’ scores of patient satisfaction |
Qiu et al59; China | PPT | Application of Activities of Daily Living Scale in NA administration | N=162 162 NAs (Mean±SD) Age 44.6±6.9 |
Intervention: patients who need NA care were divided into four grades according to Activities of Daily Living Scale scores, and NAs provided different care according to the score; Evaluation: questionnaires on patient and nursing personnel’s satisfaction on NA care quality, NA satisfaction, and NA turnover rate; Statistical method: Cronbach’s α for reliability, and Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test for outcomes |
Patient, nursing personnel and NAs’ satisfaction were all significantly improved after intervention, and NA turnover rate was decreased |
Ritchie et al60; the UK | PPT | Effect of a quality improvement education programme on restorative care practice | N=36 36 NAs and all patients in their wards |
Theory and model: 4Es (engage, educate, execute and evaluate) model and quality improve process; Intervention: a didactic study day and a 3–4-hour ward-based practice session, taught by a physical therapist; Evaluation: independent observation and scoring of preintervention and postintervention care events; Barthel and Abbreviated Mental Test scales for patients |
|
Small et al61; the USA | PPT | Development of a continuing education programme for patient care technicians | N=29 approx. 15 RNs and 14 patient care technicians |
Intervention: education sessions and teaching plans were developed by RNs; Evaluation: four-point Likert scales on teamwork, peer support and communication, and open questions on the topic were asked |
A continuing inpatient education programme for patient care technicians was developed, and the feedback was positive |
Swann62; the USA | O | Education and recognition to improve NA’s retention | Approx. 700 NAs | Theory: Imogene King’s Theory of Goal Attainment; Intervention: CNA orientation coaches (6% NAs took part); Evaluation: a retrospective descriptive survey to measure retention rate of NAs, 1 year prior to and after the intervention |
|
Tom63; the USA | PPT | Development and effectiveness of a patient safety aide training orientation programme | N=32 32 patient safety aides |
Theory: Jean Watson’s Theory of Human Caring; Intervention: a 2-day safety aide training orientation, competency and validation programme in Durham Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center (DVAMC); Evaluation: a six-item patient safety aides survey, five-item DVAMC evaluation, and monthly patient elopement and falls incidents; Statistical method: paired t-test |
|
Twigg et al64; Australia | O | Impact of adding AINs to acute care ward on adverse patient outcome | 33 AIN wards and 31 non-AIN wards, 256 302 records of patients | Theory: the Patient Care System Model; Exposure: AIN introduced in the hospital; Evaluation: CBA within ward type, and post-test evaluation between AIN and non-AIN type; Statistical method: OR |
|
Wagner65; the USA | PPT | Development and effectiveness of a delegation–communication learning programme | N=37 14 UAPs and 23 RNs (for UAP) F:M 71:29, age 18–59, high school diploma 29%, vocational certificate 29% |
Intervention: a lecture-format programme including principles, case scenarios and examples; Evaluation: independent observation for baseline survey, and a questionnaire from the Hopkins Learning Needs Assessment and the Kærnested and Bragadóttir delegation for RNs and UAPs; the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators and the Press-Ganey patient satisfaction levels for patient outcome; Statistical method: independent t-test |
|
Ward et al66; the USA | PPT | Development of a continuing education programme for CNAs | N=130 approx. 130 CNAs |
Intervention: educational offering on the run (eDOOR) programme, using eye-catching flyers, a 1-hour simulation skills lab, and a mini-inservice; Evaluation: needs assessment survey, and a 10-item CNA knowledge test |
|
Wilson et al67; the USA | PPT | Development and effectiveness of a patient handling education programme for NAs | N=254 254 NAs F:M approx. 10:1 age 18–61 |
Intervention: an 8-hour education programme, including lectures and simulation taught by healthcare professionals and physical therapists; Evaluation: a 10-item knowledge test and a 10-item confidence and comfort level in handling patient and transfer questionnaire; Statistical method: paired t-test, Wilcoxon rank test and Spearman correlation |
|
Wu et al68; China | PPT | Effectiveness of hospital management and training of NAWs | N=65 65 NAWs F:M 62:38 55% primary school background |
Intervention: a holistic management system including: NAW management centre, hospital regulations, continuing education, information system and software, charge scales and humanised management; Evaluation: NAW competency test, and patient and clinical professional’s satisfaction |
|
Yu69; China | PPT | Effectiveness of applying quality control circle to NAW’s hand hygiene administration | N=9 9 NAWs in a psychiatric ward |
Intervention: Quality Control Circle for continuing quality improvement, and fishbone diagram for analysing reasons. Education, facility improving and hand hygiene monitoring were used for increased compliance of hand hygiene of NAWs; Evaluation: independent observation of hand washing times, points, and methods; a hand hygiene compliance questionnaire; colony forming units at hand surface after hand washing |
The Quality Control Circle method improved NAW’s hand hygiene situation and compliance significantly |
Zhao et al70; China | PPT | Effectiveness of a patient-oriented stratified training model for NAs | N=75 75 NAs F:M 51:24 (Mean±SD) Age 50.7±3.4 Working experience 2.3±1.2 years |
Intervention: a training work group for development of training programme; Barthel Scale for four-grade stratification of patients, and a three-grade occupation certificate for NAs with different training contents and hours; Evaluation: NA knowledge and skill exam, and patient and nursing professionals’ satisfaction on NAs |
|
Zhi et al71; China | O | Patient satisfaction under different administration models of NA | 144 hospitals, 6211 patients | Evaluation: a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction; Statistical method: Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test for demographics and satisfaction, chi-square test and binary logistic regression for different models |
|
Zhu et al72; China | PT | Self-protection training of NAWs during COVID-19 pandemic | N=37 37 NAWs F:M 35:2 (Mean±SD) Age 49.38±7.98 Working experience 3.14±2.09 years |
Theory: Kirkpatrick Model—reaction, learning, behaviour and result (4R); Intervention: a ‘dual feedback, tertiary training and four-level evaluation’ training model, including a training work group, training taught by company, nursing department and wards about protection skills and knowledge using video and lecture, and a practical exam; Evaluation: NAW satisfaction, practical exam, independent observation of self-protection behaviour and nosocomial infection rate |
|
Zhu et al73; China | PPT | An inform sheet for patients to make NAW’s care known better | N=39 39 NAWs, 55 participants F:M of NAW 29:10 |
Intervention: an information sheet from NAWs to patients, including: what to care, what not to do, how to care, responsibilities of NAWs and personalised care; Evaluation: awareness rate of NAW routing works, and satisfaction of patients |
The information sheet can significantly improve NAWs’ awareness of regulation, safety and patient privacy, and patients were more satisfied with NAWs |
AIN, assistant in nursing; approx, approximately; CNA, certified nursing assistant; ES, evidence synthesis; F:M, female-to-male ratio; HCA, healthcare assistant; HCW, healthcare workers; LPN, licenced practical nurse; MMS, mixed methods study; N/A, not applicable; NA, nursing assistants (or nursing aides); NAW, nursing attending worker; O, observational quantitative study; PPT, pretest and post-test quantitative study; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses; PT, post-test quantitative study; Qual, qualitative study; RN, registered nurse; UAP, unlicensed assistive personnel.