Table 3.
Checklist of Odgers (adjusted)
| Yes | No | |
| Context and scope | ||
| 1. Define geographical scope. | 9 16–23 25–36 | 24 |
| 2. Define health area or focus. | 9 16–36 | None |
| 3. Define end users of research. | 9 16–36 | None |
| 4. Define the target audience. | 17 20 26 35 | 9 16 18 19 21–25 27–34 36 |
| 5. Identify the research focus. | 9 16–36 | None |
| 6. Identify the type of research question. | 9 16 17 19–23 25–27 29–34 36 | 18 24 28 35 |
| 7. Define the time frame. | None | 9 16–36 |
| Governance and team | ||
| 8. Describe selection of the project leader/s and team. | 16 17 20 24 27–31 | 9 18 19 21–23 25 26 32–36 |
| 9. Describe the characteristics of the project leader/team. | 16 17 22 23 25 26 28–31 | 9 18–21 24 27 32–36 |
| 10. Training or experience in research priority setting. | 16–21 23–31 | 9 22 32–36 |
| Inclusion of stakeholders | ||
| 11. Define the inclusion criteria for stakeholder groups involved in the priority setting partnership. | 9 18 20 22 23 25 27 32–35 | 16 17 19 21 24 26 28–31 36 |
| 12. State the strategy or method for identifying and engaging. | 9 16–36 | None |
| 13. Indicate the number of participants and/or organisations involved. | 9 16–36 | None |
| 14. Describe the characteristics of stakeholders. | 9 16–23 25–36 | 24 |
| 15. Time investment of the stakeholders | 16 17 19 22–27 34–36 | 9 18 20 21 28–33 |
| 16. Reimbursement for participation | 9 22 33–35 | 16–21 23–32 36 |
| Identification and collection of research topics | ||
| 17. Describe methods for collecting all research topics or questions. | 9 16–36 | None |
| 18. Describe methods for collating and/or categorising topics. | 9 18 19 21 23 27–29 31 33 35 | 16 17 20 22 24–26 30 32 34 36 |
| 19. Describe methods or reason for initial removal of topics or questions. | 16–23 25–30 | 9 24 31–36 |
| 20. Describe methods for refining research questions/topics. | 16 18–23 26 27 | 9 17 24 25 28–36 |
| 21. Cross-check to identify if research questions have been answered. | 16–21 23–27 29–31 36 | 9 22 28 32–35 |
| 22. Describe number of research questions/topics. | 16–31 33 35 36 | 9 32 34 |
| Prioritisation of research topics | ||
| 23. Describe specific methods to involve children | 9 17 18 25 26 | 16 19–24 27–36 |
| 24. Describe methods for prioritising or achieving consensus. | 9 16–31 33–36 | 32 |
| 25. Provide reasons for excluding research topics/questions. | 21 26–31 | 9 16–20 22–25 32–36 |
| Output | ||
| 26. Define specificity of research priorities. | 9 16 17 20–24 26 28–36 | 18 19 25 27 |
| Evaluation and feedback | ||
| 27. Describe how the research priorities exercise was evaluated. | 9 16 17 22 26 34 | 18–21 23–25 27–33 35 36 |
| 28. Describe how priorities were made accessible by stakeholders | 20 24 26–29 | 9 16–19 21–23 25 30–36 |
| 29. State how feedback was integrated. | None | 9 16–36 |
| Dissemination, translation and implementation | ||
| 30. Outline the strategy or action plans for implementing priorities. | 17 18 20 24 26 28 29 31 | 9 16 19 21–23 25 27 30 32–36 |
| 31. Describe how the participant impacted the research agenda. | 17–19 22 24 27–29 33 | 9 16 20 21 23 25 26 30–32 34–36 |
| 32. Describe how the research the research priority setting process impacted the stakeholders. | None | 9 16–36 |
| 33. Describe how impact will be measured. | 26 28 29 | 9 16–25 27 30–36 |
| Funding and conflict of interest | ||
| 34. State sources of funding. | 9 17–25 28 30 31 33 34 36 | 16 26 27 29 32 35 |
| 35. Outline the budget and/or cost. | None | 9 16–36 |
| 36. Provide declaration of conflict of interest. | 9 16 17 19–21 23 24 26 28–31 33–36 | 18 22 25 27 32 |