Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 28;17(1):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s12170-022-00711-0

Table 2.

Digital health trials in ASCVD and cardiac rehabilitation

First author Country Age mean (SD) N Race ethnicity Duration Inclusion criteria Primary outcome Results Device Intervention
Brath et al. (2013) [60] Austria 69 (4.8) 53 Not reported 40 weeks At least 2 diagnoses: HTN, DM2, HLD Intake rate at 20 weeks Significant difference in Metformin adherence. No difference in the other 3 medications Electronic blister + NFC capable smartphone Adherence text reminders to participants and adherence information to physicians
Petrella et al. (2014) [61] Canada 56.7 (9.4) 149 100% Caucasian 12 weeks At least 2 risk factors* SBP at 12 weeks. Secondary outcome: waist circumference, HBA1c, HDL, LDL SBP mean change greater in IT vs control. No difference in secondary outcomes Smartphone, app, glucometer, HBPM, weight scale, pedometer Individualized exercise program + home monitoring kit
Chow et al. (2016) [62] Australia 58 (9.2) 710 66.6% European, 10.7% South Asian, 10.1% other Asian, 9.9% Arab 6 months  ≥ 18 years of age and documented CHD** LDL-C level at 6 months Significant difference in LDL-C of − 5 mg/dL (− 9 to 0, P = 0.4) Text messages Semi-personalized text messages with motivation to improve diet, exercise, and smoking cessation
Anand et al. (2016) [63] Canada 50.6 (11.4) 343

100% South Asian

(90% India, 2.3% Pakistan, 5.2% Sri Lanka)

1 year South Asian ≥ 30 years of age MI scores at 12 months Relative change between IT and control was not significant (− 0.27, − 1.12 to 0.58, P = 0.53) Email messages Change-oriented motivational, diet, and physical activity messages
Salisbury et al. (2016) [64] UK 67.4 (4.8) 641 99% White 1 year 40–74 years of age + QRISK2 10-year risk score of ≥ 20% and modifiable diseases*** Maintaining or decreasing QRISK2 score at 12 months

Proportion that maintained or improved was not significantly different in IT vs control 50 vs 42%

(OR 1.3, 1.0–1.9, P = 0.08)

Telephone calls + web portal Health advisor plus computerized behavioral management program
Skobel et al. (2017) [65] UK, Germany, Spain 59 (14) 132 Not reported 6 months Hx of acute MI or CAD s/p PCI, LVEF ≥ 30% Peak VO2 max at 6 months in HBCR$ vs CBCR# national standards Peak VO2 max change 1.76 ± 4.1 ml/min/kg in HBCR vs − 0.4 ± 2.7 ml/min/kg in CBCR, P = 0.005

•Smartphone

•ECG

•Vest

•Vital sign senor

•Physician-facing platform

Asynchronous home-based cardiac rehabilitation
Hwang et al. (2017) [66] Australia 67 53 92% Caucasian 12 weeks  ≥ 18 years of age and recent heart failure admission, diagnosis confirmed by echocardiogram Non-inferiority: change in 6-min walk distance HBCR vs CBCR At 12 weeks, there was no between-group difference 15 m (95% CI − 28 to 59); F = 1.39, P = 0.24

•Laptop

•Mobile broadband

•HBPM

•Pulse oximeter

•Weight and resistance bands

Synchronous videoconference home-based cardiac rehabilitation
Harzand et al. (2018) [67] US 65 (5) 18 50% African American 12 weeks  ≥ 18 years with coronary heart disease plus on indication for cardiac rehabilitation BP and functional capacity (single arm feasibility study) Improvement in metabolic equivalent from 5.3 to 6.3, P = 0.008; mean BP at rest decreased from 1401 to 130.5, P = 0.039

•Smartphone platform

•Hospital-facing dashboard

Asynchronous home-based cardiac rehabilitation
Peng et al. (2018) [68] China 66.3 (10.5) 98 Not reported 4 months  ≥ 18 years, heart failure for at least 3 month and NYHA class I–III Primary: QoL, secondary: 6-min walking distance, LVEF and heart rate Statistically significant changes in QoL scores, 6-min walk distance and heart rate Web-based platform Synchronous videoconference home-based cardiac rehabilitation
Maddison et al. (2019) [69] New Zealand 61 (13) 162 75.3% NZ European, 4.3% NZ Maori, 2.5% Pacific, 8% Asian 12 weeks  ≥ 18 years with coronary heart disease within 6 months Non-inferiority outcomes: VO2 max at 12 weeks Adjusted mean VO2 max difference = 0.46, 95% CI − 0.92 to 1.84 ml/kg/min, P = 0.51

•Smartphone

•Chest-word wearable sensor

•Apps and Web Platform

Synchronous home-based cardiac rehabilitation
Tekkesin et al. (2021) [70] Turkey Mean:59 (53–64) 283 Not reported 1 year 20–79 years of age with 10 years ASCVD score ≥ 7.5% ASCVD scores at one year IT vs UC reduced ASCVD score by difference of − 2.7% (− 2.2 to − 3.3, P ≤ 0.0001) Smartphone, weight scale, smart wrists band and HBPM Daily upload of data with motivational messages and feedback
Bae et al. (2021) [71] Korea 60.4 (10.5) 879 Not reported 6 months CHD and underwent PCI LDL-C, SBP and BMI change at 6 months No significant difference in any outcome: LDL-C, SBP, and BMI Text messages Semi-personalized text messages with motivation to improve diet, exercise, and smoking cessation

*Waist circumference ≥ 88 cm (women) or 102 cm (men); SBP ≥ 135 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 85 mmHg; fasting plasma glucose ≥ 6.1 mmol/l; fasting triglycerides ≥ 1.7 mmol/l; fasting HDL ≤ 1.29 mmol/l (women) or 1.02 mmol/l (men)

**Defined as documented prior myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, or 50% or greater stenosis in at least 1 major epicardial vessel on coronary angiography

***Systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg, body mass index ≥ 30, being a current smoker, or any combination of these

$Home-based cardiac rehabilitation

#Center-based cardiac rehabilitation