Table 4.
Comparison of the mean scores on the entire YANS and BAHPHL as well as their factors obtained at test A and B (n = 34)
| Test A | Test B | Paired samples t-test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Mean | SD | Range | Mean | SD | Range | T | P | ||
| YANS | Elements of youth culture | 2.4 | 0.45 | 1.63–3.50 | 2.1 | 0.48 | 1.38–3.25 | 2.66 | 0.012 |
| Concentration in noisy environments | 2.6 | 0.89 | 1.00–4.33 | 2.5 | 0.74 | 1.33–4.00 | 0.247 | 0.806 | |
| Daily noise | 3.2 | 0.76 | 1.75–5.00 | 3.5 | 0.76 | 2.00–5.00 | –2.587 | 0.014 | |
| Intent to influence sound environment | 2 | 0.45 | 1.25–5.00 | 1.8 | 0.48 | 1.00–2.75 | 1.888 | 0.068 | |
| Entire YANS | 2.5 | 0.4 | 1.79–3.16 | 2.4 | 0.41 | 1.58–3.32 | 1.323 | 0.195 | |
| BAHPHL instrument | Susceptibility to hearing loss | 1.7 | 0.34 | 1.00–2.33 | 1.4 | 0.41 | 1.00–2.50 | 3.297 | 0.002 |
| Severity of the consequences of hearing loss | 1.5 | 0.41 | 1.00–2.67 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 1.00–2.67 | -0.257 | 0.799 | |
| Benefits of preventive action | 1.7 | 0.49 | 1.00–2.67 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 1.00–3.00 | -0.163 | 0.871 | |
| Barriers to preventive action | 3.1 | 0.6 | 2.00–4.25 | 3 | 0.91 | 1.25–4.75 | 0.733 | 0.469 | |
| Behavioral intentions | 2.2 | 0.78 | 1.00–3.67 | 1.9 | 0.96 | 1.00–4.33 | 1.764 | 0.087 | |
| Social norms | 2.4 | 0.69 | 1.00–4.00 | 2.3 | 0.83 | 1.00–4.00 | 0.7 | 0.489 | |
| Self-efficacy | 2.8 | 0.74 | 1.67–4.33 | 2.3 | 0.65 | 1.00–3.33 | 3.628 | 0.001 | |
| Entire BAHPHL | 2.2 | 0.29 | 1.67–2.83 | 2 | 0.42 | 1.29–3.04 | 3.121 | 0.004 | |
BAHPHL, Beliefs about Hearing Protection and Hearing Loss; SD, standard deviation; YANS, Youth Attitude to Noise Scale. Note. Higher mean values on the YANS and the BAHPHL are associated with more pro-noise attitudes. For both YANS and BAHPHL instrument, the mean, standard deviation, and range of scores are reflected as well as the t and p values from the paired samples t-test are given. Significant differences are indicated in bold.