Table 3.
Summary of Advantages and Limitations of Ceramic Antimicrobial Biomaterials from the Past Decade Designed for Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infection Applications
| ceramics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| composition | tested in vivo? | antimicrobial activity | advantages | limitations | ref |
| calcium sulfate (dihydrate/hemihydrate) | yes | not evaluated | (1) promote osseointegration | (1) require antibiotics | 141–143 |
| (2) limited duration of activity | |||||
| biphasic nanohydroxyapatite/calcium sulfate | yes | bacterial clearance of 100% CFUs | (1) promote osseointegration | (1) require antibiotics | 144 |
| (2) Limited duration of activity | |||||
| β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium sulfate | no | 5–40 days activity zone of inhibition (in vitro) | (1) promote osseointegration | (1) require antibiotics | 145 |
| (2) limited duration of activity | |||||