Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;13:921300. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921300

Table 3.

Hierarchical regression results.

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
TP PTEC TP TP TP PTEC
Control variables:
Leaders’ gender 0.097 (1.207) 0.043 0.079 0.049 0.048 0.008
Leaders’ working years 0.151 (2.899) −0.117 −0.007 0.096 0.087 −0.153
Leaders’ age −0.084 (2.166) −0.108 −0.151 −0.067 −0.071 −0.034
Leaders’ education level 0.004 (1.328) 0.021 0.035 0.008 0.004 −0.018
Team working years −0.152 (4.263) 0.037 −0.045 −0.082 −0.073 0.012
Team average age 0.067 (3.085) 0.129 0.124 0.03 0.025 0.186
Team average education level 0.020 (1.534) −0.008 0.064 0.091 0.088 −0.077
Arguments:
COO −0.043 (1.332) 0.785*** 0.729*** 0.069 0.773***
COM 0.062 (1.286) −0.082 0.001
Mediating variable:
PTEC 0.773*** (2.266) 0.895*** 0.842***
Moderating variable:
TEI 0.181** (2.361) 0.153
Interactive variable:
COO × TEI −0.226*

N = 101, ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.01. COO, cooperative conflict management style; COM, competitive conflict management style; PTEC, positive team emotional climate; TEI, team emotional intelligence; and TP, team passion.