Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Aug 13;73(4):388–395. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000919

Table 1.

Proportion of Public Substance Use Agency Officials Identifying Issues as Priorities for Youth Substance Use, State and County Officials, 2020

All
N= 122
State
n= 42
County
n= 80
% % % χ2 p
Addressing the social determinants of youth substance use 87 92 84 1.43 0.23
Adverse childhood experiences/childhood trauma 85 82 86 0.36 0.55
Increasing access to school-based youth substance use disorder prevention/treatment programs 82 83 81 0.04 0.84
Impact of parental substance use disorder on youth 80 83 79 0.33 0.56
Improving the implementation evidence-based youth substance use disorder treatment/prevention programs 79 92 73 6.05 0.01
Increasing access to community-based youth substance use disorder prevention/treatment programs 79 82 78 0.33 0.57
Increasing access to family-focused youth substance use disorder treatment/prevention and treatment programs 76 78 75 0.07 0.79
Coordinating youth substance use disorder services with community-based social services 76 68 81 2.45 0.12
Preventing opioid deaths among youth 73 69 74 0.34 0.56
Increasing/aligning the use of quality measures in youth substance use disorder treatment and prevention programs 72 80 68 1.76 0.18
Increasing access to harm reduction education for young people 66 58 70 1.73 0.19
Increasing access to naloxone for youth in communities and schools 49 55 46 0.83 0.36
Increasing access to medications for opioid use disorder among youth 49 43 52 0.94 0.33
De-implementing youth substance use disorder treatment/prevention programs that are not evidence-based 41 65 28 15.18 <0.001
*

An issue was coded as a “priority” if rated of 4 or 5 on 5-point Likert-scale.