Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0274639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274639

Table 3. The connection strength ranked among the top ten pairs of targets.

node1 node2 node1_string_id node2_string_id coexpression experimentally_determined_interaction database_annotated automated_textmining combined_score
AKT1 NOS3 9606.ENSP00000451828 9606.ENSP00000297494 0.049 0.879 0.9 0.988 0.999
CCNA2 CDKN1A 9606.ENSP00000274026 9606.ENSP00000384849 0.061 0.921 0.8 0.972 0.999
CCND1 CDKN1A 9606.ENSP00000227507 9606.ENSP00000384849 0.085 0.983 0.9 0.99 0.999
CCND1 ESR1 9606.ENSP00000227507 9606.ENSP00000405330 0 0.867 0.9 0.987 0.999
CDKN1A PCNA 9606.ENSP00000384849 9606.ENSP00000368458 0.063 0.998 0.9 0.265 0.999
EGF ERBB2 9606.ENSP00000265171 9606.ENSP00000269571 0.16 0.321 0.9 0.989 0.999
EGF EGFR 9606.ENSP00000265171 9606.ENSP00000275493 0.16 0.982 0.9 0.991 0.999
ESR1 JUN 9606.ENSP00000405330 9606.ENSP00000360266 0 0.684 0.9 0.988 0.999
F3 F7 9606.ENSP00000334145 9606.ENSP00000364731 0 0.978 0.9 0.99 0.999
HIF1A MDM2 9606.ENSP00000437955 9606.ENSP00000258149 0.062 0.873 0.9 0.984 0.999