Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 25;101(47):e31777. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031777

Table 4.

Methodological assessments by the GRADE software.

Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality Importance
No of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Meta-analysis of uncontrolled categorical data Control Relative (95% CI) Absolute
p, SE (follow-up mean 12 yr)
 19 Observational studies No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency Serious* No serious imprecision None – 1069 –0% See comment
⊕ΟΟ
LOW
IMPORTANT
p, SE – Asia
 14 Observational studies No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency Serious* No serious imprecision Strong association* 801 0% See comment
⊕⊕ΟΟ
LOW
IMPORTANT
p, SE – Nonasia
 5 Observational studies Little serious* Serious* No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None 268
0%
See comment
⊕ΟΟ
LOW
IMPORTANT

Author(s): yong xu.

Date: Jun 27, 2022.

Question: META analysis for femoral head necrosis.

Settings: none.

Bibliography: osteotomy for femoral head necrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Year], Issue [Issue].

CI = confidence intervals, GRADE = The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, SE = standard errors.

*

No explanation was provided.