Table 2.
Different consumers evaluating meat quality by different materials.
| [13] | [56] | [6] | [36] | [67] | [64] | [65] | [66] | [68, 69] | [70] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juisiness | Color | Color | Price | Tenderness | Ph | Appearance | Tenderness | Color | Price |
| Color | Fat level | Tenderness | Tenderness | Ph | Color | Origin | Taste | Fat content | Label |
| Tenderness | Taste | Leansess | Marbling | Color | Tenderness | price | Juiciness | Conivinent | Package |
| Flovor | Texture | Juicesness | Juiciness | Juiciness | Texture | Brand | Leaness | Promotion | Appearance |
| Leaness | Price | Flovor | Fattiness | Flavor | Juiciness | Safety | Cleaness | Trust | |
| Shelf live | Smell | Color | Nutrative value | Convenience | Certification | Origin | |||
| Price | Price | Smeel | |||||||
| Taste | |||||||||
| Tenderness | |||||||||
| Juiciness |