Skip to main content
The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging logoLink to The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging
letter
. 2022 Aug 30;32(4):627–628. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755252

Arbor Vitae Uteri

Yashant Aswani 1,, Shenaz Saifi 2
PMCID: PMC9705137  PMID: 36451950

We read with interest the pictorial essay, “Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Uterine Cervix: A Pictorial Essay,” by Gala et al. 1 The article is an excellent depiction of various pathologies affecting uterine cervix. However, we would like to make the following contributions.

The endocervical mucosa is arranged in two longitudinal ridges namely anterior and posterior from which oblique folds radiate—an appearance similar to a branching palm leaf, hence the name arbor vitae uteri ( Fig. 1 ). These are most frequently depicted in neonates and females in their 30s. 2 Since the normal neonatal cervix is disproportionately enlarged and wider than the uterine corpus 3 and the cervix in reproductive age group females is mature, an interplay of factors namely prominent size of the cervix, maturity of the cervix, and an effect of hormones has been speculated to be the cause of greater visibility and hence a higher detection rate of these folds. 2 Also known as plicae palmatae, these interdigitating branching folds are seen sometimes on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging( Fig. 2 ), but are best depicted on hysterosalpingogram. 4 These may be thin, numerous, and closely spaced or thicker, sparse, and widely spaced. 4 The longitudinal ridges from which the plicae originate have been called the ridge of plicae palmatae and may be mistaken as a uterine septum. 5 Absence of extension to the uterine fundus is, however, a feature of the ridge of plicae palmatae unlike the septum. 5 Polypoidal enlargement of plicae mimicking a tumor in a neonate has been described. 2

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Arbor vitae uteri: longitudinal transabdominal ultrasound of a normal uterus in a 6-day-old healthy girl depicts echogenic mucosal branching folds similar to a palm leaf.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Coronal T2-weighted imaging in 21-year-old ( A ) and 26-year-old ( B ) females depicts plicae palmatae ( red arrow ).

We conclude by once again commending the authors for an excellent article on an important topic.

Acknowledgement

None.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest None.

References

  • 1.Gala F B, Gala K B, Gala B M. Magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervix: a pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021;31(02):454–467. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1734377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kitami M. Plicae palmatae in neonates: tumor mimic on sonography. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2018;45(01):193–196. doi: 10.1007/s10396-017-0797-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Langer J E, Oliver E R, Lev-Toaff A S, Coleman B G. Imaging of the female pelvis through the life cycle. Radiographics. 2012;32(06):1575–1597. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wildenberg J C, Yam B L, Langer J E, Jones L P. US of the nongravid cervix with multimodality imaging correlation: normal appearance, pathologic conditions, and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 2016;36(02):596–617. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kitami M. Plicae palmatae on MRI in the pediatric population. Clin Imaging. 2018;52:200–202. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES