Table 4.

Proportion of men who had changed in treatment plan when compared to treatment plan based on combined targeted and systematic cores.

	Strategy (1): Targeted + 2/3 Systematic Cores	Strategy (2): Targeted + 1/2 Systematic cores	Strategy (3): Targeted + 1/3 Systematic cores	Strategy (4): Targeted + 1/4 Systematic cores
No change in focal therapy template, n (%)	72 (88)	67 (81)	62 (76)	58 (71)
Change in management, n (%)	10 (12)	15 (19)	20 (24)	24 (29)	p = 0.0434
Increase in focal therapy ablation zone, n (%)	8 (10)	12 (15)	15 (19)	19 (23)
Increase by 1 quadrant	8	12	15	18
Increase b ≥2 quadrants	0	0	0	1
Unsuitable for focal therapy (i.e. recommend radical therapy)	2 (2)	3 (4)	5 (6)	5 (6)