Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 28;12:20472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24312-4

Table 2.

Baseline OCT data.

Region Mean RNFL thickness (µm ± SE) The difference from mean HV baseline RNFL thickness in µm (95% CI)
Healthy volunteers Participants with MS
OS OD OS OD
Global 98 ± 1.2 99 ± 1.3  − 10 (− 14, − 5)***  − 11 (− 15, − 7)***
Temporal 70 ± 1.3 71 ± 1.5  − 11 (− 16, − 7)***  − 12 (− 17, − 7)***
Temporal inferior 145 ± 2.3 142 ± 2.4  − 15 (− 23, − 7)***  − 13 (− 22, − 5)**
Temporal superior 136 ± 1.9 136 ± 2.3  − 10 (− 17, − 3)**  − 9 (− 15, − 2)*
Nasal 74 ± 1.7 78 ± 2  − 8 (− 13, − 3)**  − 11 (− 16, − 6)***
Nasal inferior 110 ± 2.9 113 ± 3  − 5 (− 14, 4)  − 8 (− 17, 0)
Nasal superior 108 ± 2.3 99 ± 2.2  − 9 (− 17, − 1)*  − 9 (− 16, − 3)*
Mean macular volume (mm3 ± SE) The difference from mean HV baseline macular volume in mm3 (95% CI)
Healthy volunteers Participants with MS
OS OD OS OD
8.68 ± 0.04 8.66 ± 0.04  − 0.22 (− 0.35, − 0.08)**  − 0.3 (− 0.44, − 0.17)***

The differences in mean baseline RNFL thickness and macular volume for MS participants when compared to healthy volunteers (HV), assessed using an unpaired samples Student’s t-test.

SE, Standard error; CI, Confidence interval; OS, Left eye; OD, Right eye.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.