Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;32(12):8296–8305. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08930-0

Table 3.

The univariate and multivariate analysis of patients with SPL in the training set

Imaging features Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
Nodule size (cm) 1.20 0.97–1.49 .11 -- -- --
Location (head or body/tail) 0.67 0.34–1.31 .24 -- -- --
MPD dilation (≥ 4 mm) 14.98 5.59–52.31 < .001 9.37 2.59–43.05 .001
CBD dilation (≥ 10 mm) 16.21 3.25–294.59 .007 1.20 0.13–28.80 .89
Ill-defined border 28.83 11.98–77.37 < .001 10.77 3.42–37.78 < .001
Adjacent vessel involvement 11.75 2.31–214.80 .02 5.77 0.57–158.03 .20
Necrotic contents 1.88 0.68–6.06 .25 -- -- --
CEUS enhancement pattern†
  Pattern A -- -- Reference -- -- Reference
  Pattern B 48.89 17.58–157.56 < .001 15.19 4.17–63.81 < .001
  Pattern C 7.49 2.60–23.71 < .001 2.28 0.49–10.73 .29

Variables with p < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis

OR odd ratio, CI confidence intervals, MPD main pancreatic duct, CBD common bile duct, CEUS contrast-enhanced ultrasound, AP arterial phase, VP venous phase

†Pattern A: hyperenhancement in both the AP and VP, hyper- or isoenhancement in the AP followed by isoenhancement in the VP, or no enhancement through either phase; pattern B: hypoenhancement in both the AP and VP; and pattern C: iso- or hyperenhancement in the AP followed by hypoenhancement in the VP