Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;32(12):8238–8246. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08909-x

Table 2.

Consensus, recall, screen-detected (SDC), and interval cancer (IC) rate for 11 theoretical screen-reading scenarios with artificial intelligence and radiologists (R1 and R2). An AI score of 1 indicates the lowest probability of malignancy by the AI system, and 10 indicates the highest probability

Scenarios Selection rate of AI and radiologists/setup based on AI score Consensus, n (% of all examinations) Recall, n (% of all examinations) Screen-detected cancer, n (n per 1000) Potential interval cancers detected as SDC among consensus and/or recall cases, n (n per 1000) Potential rate of SDC (per 1000) with 95% confidence interval§ Potential rate of IC (per 1000) with 95% confidence interval§
Independent double reading 10,790 (8.8) 3896 (3.2) 752 (6.1) 0 1.7 (n = 205)
1 AI and R1 selects 5.8% each* 12,724 (10.4) 3357 (2.7) 721 (5.9) 77 (0.6) 6.5 (6.1–7.0) 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
2 AI selects 10.1% (AI score = 10) and R1 selects 5.8%* 17,394 (14.2) 3412 (2.8) 729 (5.9) 100 (0.8) 6.7 (6.3–7.2) 0.9 (0.7–1.0)
3

AI score 1–5: negative

AI score 6–10: R1+R2

7955 (6.5) 3201 (2.6) 735 (6.0) 45 (0.4) 6.3 (5.9–6.8) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
4

AI score 1–7: negative

AI score 8–10: R1+R2

5894 (5.0) 2564 (2.1) 719 (5.8) 43 (0.3) 6.2 (5.8–6.7) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
5

AI score 1–9: negative

AI score 10: R1+R2

2805 (2.3) 1437 (1.2) 653 (5.3) 33 (0.3) 5.6 (5.2–6.0) 1.4 (1.2–1.6)
6

AI score 1–5: negative

AI score 6–10: R1

5301 (4.3) 2669 (2.2) 651 (5.3) 28 (0.2) 5.5 (5.1–6.0) 1.4 (1.2–1.7)
7

AI score 1–5: R1

AI score 6–10: R1+R2

9683 (7.9) 3749 (3.1) 747 (6.1) 46 (0.4) 6.4 (6.0–6.9) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
8

AI score 1–7: R1

AI score 8–10: R1+R2

8880 (7.2) 3614 (2.9) 746 (6.1) 45 (0.4) 6.4 (6.0–6.9) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
9

AI score 1–5: negative

AI score 6–7.5: R1

AI score 7.6–10: R1+R2

6934 (5.6) 3028 (2.5) 731 (5.9) 44 (0.4) 6.3 (5.9–6.8) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
10

AI score 1–5: negative

AI score 6–7.5: R1+R2

AI score 7.6–10: R1

6322 (5.1) 2842 (2.3) 655 (5.3) 29 (0.2) 5.6 (5.2–6.0) 1.4 (1.2–1.7)
11 3.2%* - 3896 (3.2) 555 (4.5) 44 (0.4) 4.9 (4.5–5.3) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)

*5.8% mimics the average selection rate of the individual radiologists in the study sample, and 3.2% mimics the recall rate in the study sample after independent double reading

Number of interval cancers among consensus cases in Scenario 1–10. Number of interval cancers among cases that AI as a standalone system selected to be recalled in scenario 11

§If all IC with prior exams among consensus and/or recall cases were present at screening and detected as screen-detected and not interval cancers

The actual rate and number of interval cancers in the study sample