Table 3.
Performance of our method.
| Algorithm | Selection | AUC | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merged | TestCath | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.61 |
| TestNoCath | - | 0.86 | - | - | |
| Classification | TestCath | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.61 |
| TestNoCath | - | 0.90 | - | - | |
| Regression | TestCath | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.67 |
| TestNoCath | - | 0.59 | - | - |
The table lists the obtained AUC, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Rows correspond to the classification, regression and merged outputs. To obtain binary predictions, for probabilities a threshold of 0.5 was used and for regressed FFR values a threshold of 0.8.