Table 1.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|
Reduces risk of donor-site morbidity, as harvesting an autograft is not required | Learning curve for the technique that must be overcome by surgeons |
Expands the indication for repair by including mid-substance ACL tears | Increased surgical time |
Can be used in young, athletic patient populations | Recommendation to avoid knee flexion or to irrigate the joint immediately following BEAR fixation (preventing arthroscopic visualization postfixation) |
Absolute reapproximation of the torn edges of the ACL is not required for healing as the scaffold bridges the gap | Immediate postoperative period requires immobilization in extension |
Potentially decreases the risk of developing premature osteoarthritis as compared to reconstruction | Lacking in large-population, high-quality studies relative to reconstruction |
May result in better postoperative hamstring strength than those undergoing reconstruction with ST-G autograft |
ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; BEAR, bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair; ST-G, semitendinosus–gracilis.