Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 15;13:1006659. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1006659

Table 2.

Sensitivity and specificity of malaria diagnostic methods.

Diagnostic methods Sensitivity Specificity Specifications References
Microscopy 75.20% 97.12% Comparative study.Thick blood films are 20–40 times more sensitive than thin blood films. Parasite density interferes with the final result and is crucial to obtain a reliable conclusion. Bejon et al. (2006), Wangai et al. (2011), Feleke et al. (2021)
QBC 55.9% 88.8% Lagos State University Teaching Hospital. Adeoye and Nga (2007)
70.5% 92.1% University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Ifeorah et al. (2017)
RDTs 84.2% 99.8% BinaxNOW test. DiMaio et al. (2012)
63.4–100% 53.4–99.9% Mixed brands (Comparative study). Boyce and O’Meara (2017)
84.2% 95.2% University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria / pLDH RDT Optimal. Ifeorah et al. (2017)
37–88% (37 and 51% in asympt.) 93–100% (28% in one outlier) Mixed brands (Comparative study). Feleke et al. (2021)
LAMP 100% 86–99% LAMP compared with PCR. Feleke et al. (2021), Puri et al. (2022)
95–98% 91–99% LAMP compared with PCR. Morris and Aydin-Schmidt (2021)
PCR Considered 100% Considered 100% Used as a reference to be compared with other techniques. Feleke et al. (2021), Mwenda et al. (2021)

QBC: Quantitative Buffy Coat, RDTs: Rapid Diagnostic Tests, pLDH: Plasmodium lactose dehydrogenase, LAMP: Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction, asympt: Asymptomatic.