Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 16;190(4):2617–2636. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac375

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of mutations in CAX genes on waterlogging tolerance. A, Photographs of representative plants (≥17 plants) after 2 weeks of waterlogging. B, Rosette area shown as PLA of control and waterlogged plants for each genotype. Student’s t test: *P ≤ 0.05; error bars: standard deviation from mean. C, PLA ratio of plants after 2 weeks of waterlogging. The ratio has been obtained between the PLA values of individual plants subjected to waterlogging and the average area value of aerobic plants. D, Color (HUE) of plants after 2 weeks of waterlogging. In the box-blots, the dots represent the single data points, whiskers denote the min/max values, the box defines the interquartile range, center represents the median, box bounds represent the lower and upper quartiles (at least 20 biological replicates). Different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) after Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test. GraphPad 8.0.1 software (Q = 0.1%) did not identify any outliers and hence all the data points are all represented in the plot.