Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;8(11):e11786. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11786

Table 2.

The current meta-analysis results under the six genetic models.

Genetic models Pooled OR (95% CI) Z P Studies number T2D size control size Pheterogeneity(I2%)
Allelic genetic model 1.038 (0.994–1.084) 1.68 0.093 7 6576 7176 0.617 (0%)
Recessive genetic model 1.148 (1.052–1.253) 3.10 0.002∗ 7 6576 7176 0.061 (50.3%)
Dominant genetic model 0.950 (0.885–1.020) 1.41 0.160 7 6576 7176 0.154 (35.9%)
Heterozygous genetic model 1.016 (0.943–1.096) 0.42 0.672 7 6576 7176 0.264 (21.7%)
Homozygous genetic model 1.197 (1.023–1.401) 2.24 0.025∗ 7 6576 7176 0.045∗ (53.4%)
Additive genetic model 1.067 (1.017–1.120) 2.65 0.008∗ 7 6576 7176 0.063 (49.9%)

P < 0.05.

▽: the “fixed effects model” was applied to compute the pooled OR under the allelic, recessive, dominant, heterozygous and additive genetic models.

△: the “random effects model” was applied to compute the pooled OR under the homozygous genetic models.

Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; T2D size: the total number of T2DM cases; control size: the total number of control group; Allelic genetic model: G allele vs. G allele + C allele; Recessive genetic model: GG vs. CC + CG; Dominant genetic model: CC vs. GG + CG; Heterozygous genetic model: CG vs. CC; Homozygous genetic model: GG vs. CC; Additive genetic model: G allele vs. C allele.