Table 4.
Effects of trait, demographic, emotion dysregulation, and dating app variables on disordered eating, for the whole sample (Model 1) and dating app users only (Model 3)
| Model 1 | Model 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | t | p | Β | t | p | ||
| Step 1 | |||||||
| Female gender | 0.19 | 5.13 | <0.001 | 0.19 | 3.40 | 0.001 | |
| BMI | 0.17 | 4.48 | <0.001 | 0.15 | 2.62 | 0.009 | |
| History of an eating disorder | 0.21 | 5.49 | <0.001 | 0.21 | 3.75 | <0.001 | |
| Step 2 | |||||||
| Appearance-based rejection sensitivity | 0.32 | 7.80 | <0.001 | 0.36 | 6.15 | <0.001 | |
| Social rank | − 0.05 | − 1.41 | 0.159 | − 0.01 | − 0.13 | 0.895 | |
| Fear of negative evaluation | 0.05 | 1.20 | 0.231 | 0.06 | 0.94 | 0.349 | |
| Emotion dysregulation | 0.15 | 4.01 | <0.001 | 0.21 | 3.85 | <0.001 | |
| Step 3 | |||||||
| Dating app user | 0.07 | 2.15 | 0.032 | ||||
| Using apps for love | − 0.12 | − 2.42 | 0.016 | ||||
| Using apps for casual sex | 0.07 | 1.43 | 0.155 | ||||
| Using apps for ease of communication | 0.12 | 2.59 | 0.010 | ||||
| Using apps for self-worth validation | 0.13 | 2.50 | 0.013 | ||||
| Using apps for thrill of excitement | − 0.10 | − 2.11 | 0.036 | ||||
| Using apps for trendiness | − 0.05 | − 1.03 | 0.306 | ||||
Model 1: Step 1 F(3, 651) = 28.31, p < .001, R2 = .12; Step 2 F(7, 651) = 42.02, p < .001, R2 = .31; Step 3 F(8, 651) = 37.55, p < .001, R2 = .32. Model 3 Step 1 F(3, 288) = 13.49, p < .001, R2 = .12; Step 2 F(7, 288) = 24.00, p < .001, R2 = .37. Step 3 F(13, 275) = 15.28, p < .001, R2 = .42
Significant p values were bolded