Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;61(12):4809–4816. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac125

Table 2.

Comparison between clinically active and inactive LVV patients

Characteristics Active LVV (n = 125) LVV in remission (n = 351) P-value
Age at PET/CT, mean (s.d.), years 49.9 (19.1) 51.0 (16.8) 0.534
PETVAS, mean (s.d.) 10.5 (7.9) 4.4 (5.5) <0.0001
ESR, mean (s.d.), mm/1 ha 54.6 (34.5) 20.2 (15.1) <0.0001
CRP, mean (s.d.), mg/dlb 5.4 (10.4) 0.8 (1.4) <0.0001
Presence of at least one symptom suggestive for active vasculitis, n (%)c 95 (76.0)d 0e <0.0001
Patients on prednisone, n (%) 111 (88.8) 191 (54.4) <0.0001
Prednisone dose, mean (s.d.), mg/day 31.6 (19.1) 11.2 (11.9) <0.0001
Patients on prednisone >20 mg/day, n (%) 71 (56.8) 31 (8.8) <0.0001
Disease duration at PET/CT scans, mean (s.d.), months 37.4 (49.9) 68.1 (37.4) <0.0001
a

Missing = 16.

b

Missing = 11.

c

Missing = 8.

d

30 patients without any symptoms suggestive for active vasculitis were classified as active according to the Kerr/NIH criteria (elevated ESR and/or CRP and angiographic features indicative of vasculitis).

e

13 patients (3.7%) in LVV remission had isolated fatigue associated with elevated ESR or CRP.