Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 29;22:315. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03792-x

Table 2.

Comparison of the process and consequences of coronary angiography between the Hypnosis and Control groups

Characteristic Hypnosis
group
(N = 85)
Control
group
(N = 84)
P*
Use of Midazolam 9 (11) 14 (17) 0.27
Use of I-V paracetamol 1 (1) 2 (2) 0.62
Use of morphine 1 (1) 2 (2) 0.62
Operator believes that the patient is under hypnosis
 Yes 54 (64) 50 (60) 0.85
 No 22 (26) 25 (30)
 No opinion 9 (11) 9 (11)
Pain before the procedure (visual analog scale) 0 (0; 8)* 0 (0; 7)* 0.95
 VAS ≥ 4 5 (6) 7 (8) 0.57
Pain after the procedure 0 (0; 6)* 0 (0; 7)* 0.50
 VAS ≥ 4 1 (1) 3 (4) 0.37
Pain the day after the procedure 0 (0; 6)* 0 (0; 3)* 0.42
 VAS ≥ 4 3 (4) 1 (1) 0.62
Complications 8 (9) 11 (13) 0.48
 Vasovagal episode 4 (5) 4 (5) 0.99
 Hematoma 4 (5) 5 (6) 0.75
 Cutaneous allergy 1 (1) 1 (1) 0.99
 Anaphylactic shock 1 (1) 0 (0) 0.99
 Ventricular fibrillation 0 (0) 1 (1) 0.50
State anxiety (STAI-Y A) immediately before the procedure 45 (35; 73) 46 (36; 74) 0.23
 In women 44 (35; 65) 44 (36; 69) 0.53
 In men 46 (39; 73) 48 (39; 74) 0.21
Operator satisfaction
 Yes (greater than 4/5) 58 (68) 59 (70) 0.99
 No (less than or equal to 4/5) 18 (21) 17 (20)
 No opinion 9 (11) 8 (10)

Data are presented as median (min; max) or number (percentage) *Wilcoxon or Fischer’s exact tests