Table 4. Comparison of assay sensitivity among different AHSV assays* .
Sample | Method | Limit of detection | AUC | Slope |
---|---|---|---|---|
AHSV-1 Thailand 110983/63 |
AHSV VP7 rRT-PCR | [10−5] | 0.943 |
−3.89 |
AHSV-1 VP2 Serotyping rRT-PCR | [10−4] | |||
AHSV-1 VP5 DIVA rRT-PCR 1 |
[10−4] |
|||
AHSV-1 OBP LAV | AHSV VP7 rRT-PCR | [10−6] | 0.900 | −3.49 |
AHSV-1 VP2 Serotyping rRT-PCR | [10−5] | |||
AHSV-1 VP5 DIVA rRT-PCR 2 | [10−5] |
*The limit of detection was reported from the lowest observed amount of DNA amplified below the Ct <40 threshold. The AUC and slope values derived from the calibration curve are also listed. AHSV, African horse sickness virus; AUC, area under the receiver operating curve; Ct, cycle threshold; DIVA, Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals; OBP LAV, Onderstepoort Biologic Products (https://www.obpvaccines.co.za) live attenuated vaccine; rRT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription PCR; VP, viral protein.