Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec;28(12):2446–2454. doi: 10.3201/eid2812.220594

Table 4. Comparison of assay sensitivity among different AHSV assays* .

Sample Method Limit of detection AUC Slope
AHSV-1 Thailand 110983/63
AHSV VP7 rRT-PCR [10−5] 0.943
−3.89
AHSV-1 VP2 Serotyping rRT-PCR [10−4]
AHSV-1 VP5 DIVA rRT-PCR 1
[10−4]
AHSV-1 OBP LAV AHSV VP7 rRT-PCR [10−6] 0.900 −3.49
AHSV-1 VP2 Serotyping rRT-PCR [10−5]
AHSV-1 VP5 DIVA rRT-PCR 2 [10−5]

*The limit of detection was reported from the lowest observed amount of DNA amplified below the Ct <40 threshold. The AUC and slope values derived from the calibration curve are also listed. AHSV, African horse sickness virus; AUC, area under the receiver operating curve; Ct, cycle threshold; DIVA, Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals; OBP LAV, Onderstepoort Biologic Products (https://www.obpvaccines.co.za) live attenuated vaccine; rRT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription PCR; VP, viral protein.