Table 6.
95% CI |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome | Predictor | B | p | Lower | Upper |
| |||||
Relationship | Paternal Intercept | 32.62 | <.001 | 29.19 | 36.04 |
Satisfaction | Maternal Intercept | 39.27 | <.001 | 36.83 | 41.70 |
Paternal Slope | −0.22 | .25 | −0.59 | 0.16 | |
Maternal Slope | −0.03 | .80 | −0.26 | 0.20 | |
Paternal Lagged RS | 1.53 | <.001 | 1.44 | 1.62 | |
Maternal Lagged RS | 0.22 | <.001 | 0.16 | 0.27 | |
Paternal Lagged Actor PE | 3.10 | <.001 | 2.43 | 3.78 | |
Maternal Lagged Actor PE | 0.54 | .01 | 0.13 | 0.95 | |
Paternal Lagged Partner PE | −0.40 | .20 | −1.00 | 0.21 | |
Maternal Lagged Partner PE | 0.37 | .15 | −0.14 | 0.87 | |
| |||||
Outcome | Predictor | B | p | Lower | Upper |
| |||||
Perceptions | Paternal Intercept | 3.94 | <.001 | 3.35 | 4.53 |
of PS | Maternal Intercept | 5.91 | <.001 | 5.32 | 6.50 |
Paternal Slope | −0.03 | .32 | −0.08 | 0.03 | |
Maternal Slope | −0.03 | .23 | −0.07 | 0.02 | |
Paternal Lagged Perceptions of PS | 0.69 | <.001 | 0.61 | 0.77 | |
Maternal Lagged Perceptions of PS | 0.19 | <.001 | 0.11 | 0.27 | |
Paternal Lagged Actor PE | 0.49 | <.001 | 0.37 | 0.62 | |
Maternal Lagged Actor PE | 0.10 | .054 | 0.00 | 0.20 | |
Paternal Lagged Partner PE | 0.06 | .26 | −0.05 | 0.17 | |
Maternal Lagged Partner PE | −0.04 | .52 | −0.17 | 0.08 | |
| |||||
Outcome | Predictor | B | p | Lower | Upper |
| |||||
Support | Paternal Intercept | 4.54 | <.001 | 3.99 | 5.08 |
Provision | Maternal Intercept | 5.64 | <.001 | 5.24 | 6.03 |
Paternal Slope | −0.02 | .46 | −0.07 | 0.03 | |
Maternal Slope | −0.001 | .99 | −0.03 | 0.03 | |
Paternal Lagged Support Provided | 0.94 | <.001 | 0.84 | 1.04 | |
Maternal Lagged Support Provided | 0.10 | .003 | 0.04 | 0.16 | |
Paternal Lagged Actor PE | 0.43 | <.001 | 0.32 | 0.54 | |
Maternal Lagged Actor PE | 0.09 | .01 | 0.02 | 0.15 | |
Paternal Lagged Partner PE | −0.002 | 0.96 | −0.10 | 0.10 | |
Maternal Lagged Partner PE | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.17 |
Note. RS = relationship satisfaction. PE = positive emotions.
p < .05.
p < .01.