Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2022 Aug 2;163(6):1510–1521.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.07.071

Table 2:

Histologic Efficacy Analysis – mITT Population

Vh:Cd Ratios Placebo (N=22) IMGX003 (N=21)

Visit 2 (Day −14; Baseline)
 n 22 21
 Mean (SD) 2.95 (0.473) 2.99 (0.326)
 Median 2.93 3.00
 Minimum, Maximum 2.26, 3.89 2.13, 3.53
Visit 4 (Day 42)
 n 22 21
 Mean (SD) 2.61 (0.657) 2.95 (0.504)
 Median 2.52 2.97
 Minimum, Maximum 1.62, 3.73 1.99, 4.20
Change from Baseline to Visit 4 (Day 42)
 n 22 21
 Mean (SD) −0.35 (0.616) −0.04 (0.466)
 Median −0.28 −0.05
 Minimum, Maximum −1.38, 1.01 −1.04, 0.83
 Within-Group P-value [1] .0148 .6713
 Between-Group P-value [2] .0570

IEL Placebo (N=22) IMGX003 (N=21)

Visit 2 (Day −14; Baseline)
 n 22 21
 Mean (SD) 34.55 (13.588) 35.05 (17.279)
 Median 38.00 33.00
 Minimum, Maximum 12.00, 62.00 10.00, 82.50
Visit 4 (Day 42)
 n 22 21
 Mean (SD) 59.30 (23.697) 44.83 (22.592)
 Median 54.75 37.50
 Minimum, Maximum 17.50, 98.50 17.00, 98.50
Change from Baseline to Visit 4 (Day 42)
 n 22 21
 Mean (SD) 24.75 (22.941) 9.79 (15.741)
 Median 24.75 7.00
 Minimum, Maximum −12.50, 66.00 −11.00, 54.00
 Within-Group P-value [1] < .0001 .0099
 Between-Group P-value [2] .0181
[1]

P-value was calculated using a paired t-test of Visit 4 (Day 42) compared to Visit 2 (Day −14) values within each treatment arm and indicates if the change at Visit 4 (Day 42) is statistically significantly different than 0.

[2]

P-value was calculated using a linear regression model including baseline Vh:Cd and treatment as covariates and indicates if the mean change/pct change from baseline at Visit 4 is different between the treatment arms.