TABLE 1—

Community Steering Committee Research Engagement Survey Tool Results: New York City, April 2021

Engagement Principles and Scale	No.	Likert Response,a %					Mean Score (95% CI)
		1	2	3	4	5
Focus on community perspectives and determinants of health
Quality	14	1.8	5.4	16.1	25.0	51.8	4.2 (3.7, 4.7)
Quantity	12	0.0	0.0	6.3	50.0	43.8	4.4 (4.1, 4.6)
Partner input
Quality	14	0.0	1.8	17.9	21.4	58.9	4.4 (3.9, 4.8)
Quantity	12	0.0	0.0	17.0	38.3	44.7	4.3 (3.9, 4.7)
Partnership sustainability to meet goals and objectives
Quality	14	1.4	7.1	12.9	27.1	48.6	4.2 (3.7, 4.8)
Quantity	12	1.7	1.7	23.3	25.0	45.0	4.2 (3.7, 4.7)
Colearning, capacity building, and cobenefit for all partners
Quality	13	1.9	1.9	13.5	28.8	53.8	4.3 (3.8, 4.8)
Quantity	11	0.0	4.5	9.1	29.5	56.8	4.4 (3.9, 4.9)
Building on strengths and resources within the community or patient population
Quality	13	0.0	5.1	15.4	20.5	59.0	4.3 (3.8, 4.8)
Quantity	11	0.0	0.0	21.2	12.1	66.7	4.5 (3.9, 5.0)
Facilitating collaborative, equitable partnerships
Quality	12	0.0	4.3	0.0	38.3	55.3	4.5 (4.2, 4.8)
Quantity	10	0.0	0.0	7.7	38.5	51.3	4.6 (4.1, 4.9)
Involving all partners in the dissemination process
Quality	12	0.0	0.0	2.8	47.2	44.4	4.5 (4.2, 4.8)
Quantity	10	0.0	0.0	10.0	40.0	46.7	4.4 (4.0, 4.9)
Building and maintaining trust in the partnership
Quality	12	0.0	0.0	1.7	33.3	65.0	4.6 (4.3, 4.9)
Quantity	10	0.0	0.0	8.0	42.0	50.0	4.4 (4.0, 4.8)
Overall
Quality	13	0.7	3.4	10.3	29.6	54.8	4.3 (3.9, 4.8)
Quantity	11	0.3	0.9	13.1	34.8	49.9	4.3 (4.0, 4.7)

Note. CI = confidence interval.

^aFor Likert responses, the scores indicate the following: quality: (1) poor, (2) fair, (3) good, (4) very good, (5) excellent; quantity: (1) never, (2) rarely, (3) sometimes, (4) often, (5) always.