Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0278217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278217

Table 8. AUC comparison results for different sampling techniques.

Model LR RF GB XGBoost DNN 1DCNN
UnderSampler 88.0 94.7 82.5 92.5 88.1 87.3
OverSampler 84.1 87.6 82.0 80.9 78.9 77.2
BorderlineSMOTE 87.1 99.1 95.7 98.6 98.9 98.8
SMOTETomek 89.9 99.9 97.3 99.8 99.6 99.8