Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 5;2(4):576–585. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab071

Table 3.

Performance statistics for the RF classifier models (1–6 refer to Table 1) for the training, validation and test sets

Model # 1
2
3
4
5
6
Valid Test Valid Test Valid Test Valid Test Valid Test Valid Test
Acc 0.942±0.000 0.762 0.943±0.002 0.937 0.944±0.000 0.948 0.944±0.000 0.945 0.946±0.000 0.949 0.946±0.000 0.949
F1-score 0.072±0.003 0.071 0.072±0.012 0.066 0.137±0.010 0.135 0.143±0.002 0.141 0.187±0.005 0.196 0.189±0.002 0.199
Se 0.208±0.009 0.192 0.203±0.031 0.211 0.408±0.031 0.385 0.429±0.006 0.427 0.573±0.018 0.588 0.581±0.009 0.596
Sp 0.950±0.000 0.955 0.951±0.002 0.945 0.950±0.000 0.954 0.950±0.000 0.951 0.950±0.000 0.953 0.950±0.000 0.953
PPV 0.044±0.002 0.043 0.044±0.007 0.039 0.082±0.006 0.082 0.086±0.001 0.085 0.111±0.003 0.118 0.113±0.001 0.119
NPV 0.991±0.000 0.991 0.991±0.000 0.991 0.993±0.000 0.993 0.993±0.000 0.994 0.995±0.000 0.995 0.995±0.000 0.996
AUROC 0.774±0.011 0.783 0.773-0.790 0.676±0.028 0.690 (0.684 − 0.706) 0.840±0.019 0.839 (0.826 − 0.843) 0.820±0.002 0.823 (0.814 − 0.833) 0.894±0.006 0.901 (0.893 − 0.906) 0.900±0.004 0.909 (0.903–0.914)

For train and validation, the mean±standard deviation is reported. For test AUROC, 95% CI is reported as (lower, upper) near the reported score. Best AUROC performance is obtained for model 6 (underlined).