Table 3.
SM use profiles predicting subsequent typical weekly drinking, negative consequences, and perceived descriptive and injunctive peer drinking norms (separate models).
Typical Weekly Drinking (T3) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
b(SE) | p-value | b(SE) | p-value | |
LGU+LAP | ref | ref | –3.63(1.77) | .040 |
HGU+LAP | 3.63(1.77) | .040 | ref | ref |
HGU+HAP | 7.12(2.37) | .003 | 3.49(1.65) | .035 |
Typical Weekly Drinking (Baseline) | 0.51(0.12) | <.001 | 0.51(1.23) | <.001 |
Female | −3.40(1.06) | .001 | −3.40(1.06) | .001 |
| ||||
Negative Alcohol Consequences (T3) | ||||
| ||||
b(SE) | p-value | b(SE) | p-value | |
| ||||
LGU+LAP | ref | ref | –1.14(0.86) | .183 |
HGU+LAP | 1.14(0.86) | .183 | ref | ref |
HGU+HAP | 3.01(1.24) | .015 | 1.87(0.92) | .042 |
Typical Weekly Drinking (Baseline) | 0.14(0.06) | .025 | 0.14(0.06) | .025 |
Female | –0.87(0.59) | .139 | –0.87(0.59) | .139 |
| ||||
Descriptive Peer Drinking Norms (T2) | ||||
| ||||
b(SE) | p-value | b(SE) | p-value | |
| ||||
LGU+LAP | ref | ref | –2.19(0.84) | .005 |
HGU+LAP | 2.19(0.84) | .005 | ref | ref |
HGU+HAP | 4.10(1.19) | .001 | 1.91(0.97) | .049 |
Descriptive Peer Drinking Norms (Baseline) | 0.40(0.06) | <.001 | 0.40(0.06) | <.001 |
Female | –2.10(0.65) | .001 | –2.10(0.65) | .001 |
| ||||
Injunctive Peer Drinking Norms (T2) | ||||
| ||||
b(SE) | p-value | b(SE) | p-value | |
| ||||
LGU+LAP | ref | ref | –0.76(0.27) | <.001 |
HGU+LAP | 0.76(0.27) | <.001 | ref | ref |
HGU+HAP | 0.81(0.22) | <.001 | 0.05(0.17) | .769 |
Injunctive Peer Drinking Norms (Baseline) | 0.38(0.06) | <.001 | 0.38(0.06) | <.001 |
Female | 0.10(0.12) | .383 | 0.10(0.12) | .383 |
Note. LGU+LAP=Low General SM Use + Low Alcohol-Related Posting; HGU+LAP=High General SM Use + Low Alcohol-Related Posting; HGU+HAP=High General SM Use + High Alcohol-Related Posting.